12-06-1989 Regular Planning Commission Meeting Agenda

Home Browse Search

Minutes of the Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting, 11-01-89 Page 4 CASE #89-18 (Cont'd) The Planner noted the proposed additions are consistent with the 1984 approved Master Plan, only minor grading will be necessary to accommodate the proposed additions and if any trees or • shrubs are disturbed/damaged, they will be replaced in a nearby location. He stated the project is being proposed to serve the existing student population and not in response to anticipated growth. Bergly also advised interior remodeling of both the girls' and boys' locker rooms is part of the construction project, however, those improvements will not affect the building exterior or the site. Bill Martin, architect for the project, was present and explained the school district will replant any trees removed during the construction. He explained the mechanical room is enlarged from the original plan to accommodate more mechanical equipment than first anticipated. Martin stated the connecting link will have a small canopy with a seating area for baseball and football players to remove their cleats. Member Petersen questioned if the connecting link would create a courtyard area and if access will be provided. He expressed concern relative to fire personnel access. Architect Martin advised a courtyard area is created and door from the existing link and the boiler room are provided. He explained discussions of this nature had come up during prior construction of an addition; this should be in conformance with Fire Code standards and a building code review will be done prior to issuance of the building permit. He also noted there is an existing catch basin in the area and storm water will be adequately removed; this was included in the construction of the gym addition • planning. Ashbach moved, seconded by Zehm, that Commission recommend to Council approval of Case #89-18, as submitted, based on the Planner's considerations listed in his report of 11-1-89 . Motion carried unanimously. (7-0) DISCUSSION; The Planner advised Community Service Officer Dick RV PARKING Cieminski had conducted a survey of neighboring cities relative to recreational vehicle parking in residential districts. He stated this matter had surfaced recently due to parking complaints and citizen complaints that the City Ordinance is restrictive. Bergly stated he had contacted six other communities and found their ordinances are less restrictive than Arden Hills and are similar to the communities Cieminski had surveyed. Chairman Probst noted this matter was referred for study from Council and he questioned if the Attorney has had an opportunity to review and comment on this matter. Dick Cieminski reviewed his recommendations for amending the current City Ordinance. Jim Ross, 4029 Fairview Avenue, stated he owns a 34 ft. recreational vehicle. Ross explained the vehicle is well-kept and quite beautiful and he currently • stores the vehicle during the winter months and parks it on the side of his garage during the times it is not utilized in the summer months. Ross advised it is not feasible to store the vehicle away from his home during the summer months and he favored a less restrictive Ordinance. Chairman Probst stated he would prefer to receive input from the City Attorney prior to determining if the Ordinance is too restrictive.