My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-14-07 Minutes for Approval
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
05-14-07-R
>
05-14-07 Minutes for Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2024 12:17:40 AM
Creation date
9/22/2022 10:25:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 30, 2007 8 <br /> Agreement dated May 1, 2007, from Black Dot Wireless on behalf of • <br /> Cingular Wireless PCS. The motion carried unanimously(5-0). <br /> D. Request to Provide Feedback Regarding the Care-A-Van Funding Request <br /> Ms. Wolfe stated earlier this year, staff at the cities of Shoreview, New Brighton, Mounds View, <br /> and Arden Hills were approached by Nick Temali of Mounds View School District (MVSD) <br /> Community Education to discuss the Care-A-Van program. She provided information about the <br /> service. She requested Council's feedback regarding the possibility of a financial contribution to <br /> the Care-A-Van service. <br /> Councilmember Holmes noted she was familiar with this service as her mother had used it. She <br /> noted her mother had switched to Metro Mobility, which was more cost effective. She believed <br /> this was a service whose time had gone now that Metro Mobility was in business and she was not <br /> sure they should be supporting this this year. <br /> Councilmember Holden noted Metro Mobility was heavily subsidized so their fees could be <br /> lower. She did not believe the community education people would take this on because of the <br /> cost. She indicated Roseville also had a circular that picked up people. She stated she was <br /> neither for nor against this because she did not have enough information. She stated if this might <br /> be more heavily advertised, they might be able to cut the rates. She stated she would like to see <br /> what Roseville did. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated he did not have enough information to make an informed • <br /> comment on whether this was worthy of support or not and he wanted additional information. <br /> He stated he also wanted further information on Metro Mobility. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated he wanted more information about the service and detailed <br /> numbers. He indicated he also wanted more information on Metro Mobility. <br /> Mayor Harpstead stated they did not want people to be left stranded and they needed to look at <br /> the alternatives and identify the individuals whose needs were not being met by the alternatives. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated they also needed to ensure the other Cities were in support of this <br /> as well. <br /> E. County Road H Interchange Improvement Project: <br /> 1. Motion to Approve Amendment #1 to the Preliminary Development <br /> Agreement dated March 30, 2007 <br /> 2. Motion to Approve Resolution 07-51: Relating to Financing of Proiect and <br /> Establishing Intent with Respect to Reimbursement <br /> Ms. Wolfe stated the City was currently conducting a Master Planning process for TCAAP • <br /> redevelopment. As part of that project, several transportation improvements will be needed. In <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.