My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-22-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2022
>
10-17-22-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2022 11:55:46 AM
Creation date
10/13/2022 11:54:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 5 <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM – 1B <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: October 17, 2022 <br /> <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers <br /> Dave Perrault, City Administrator <br /> <br />FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Community Development Director <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Planning Case 22-020 – Concept Plan Review <br />Variance – 1861 Highway 96 W. <br /> <br /> Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: <br /> N/A N/A N/A <br /> <br />Council Should Consider <br /> <br />Council should consider a request for a Concept Plan Review for a proposed variance at 1861 <br />Highway 96 West (“Subject Property”) to demo and rebuild a single-family residential dwelling. <br />Katie Bach and Nate Cmiel (“the Applicants”) are seeking feedback from the City Council on <br />the concept plan in advance of the full submission. The variance portion of the concept plan <br />review is due to a reduced front yard setback of 28 feet versus 40 feet as required by city code. <br /> <br />The Concept Plan Review process is an opportunity for the City Council to provide comments <br />and questions regarding proposed developments. A concept review is considered advisory and is <br />nonbinding to the City and Applicant (Section 1320.14, Subd 4 of the Zoning Code). No formal <br />action can be taken at a Work Session. A formal land use application for the minor subdivision <br />and variance will be subject to the full review process, including a recommendation from the <br />Planning Commission prior to a final decision by the City Council. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />The Subject Property is currently developed with a single-family residential dwelling (727 SF) <br />and detached garage (584 SF). The dwelling was constructed in 1939 and the detached garage <br />was added in 1961. The original legal description for the subject property has a described <br />property boundary of 1.0689-acres (46,561 SF). Between 1949 and 2014, there have been four <br />acquisitions of land by the State of Minnesota and Ramsey County for highway right-of-way <br />purposes. As a result of the ROW dedication, the parcel size has been reduced to 0.62-acre <br />(27,098 SF) as shown on the survey provided. The reduction in lot area due to the dedication of <br />ROW is primarily along the north and northeast sides of the property which is considered to be <br />the front yard for the Subject Property. Today, the property is considered legal nonconforming <br />with a front yard setback of 25 feet as measured from the northeast corner of the home.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.