My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-23-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
01-17-23-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2023 3:17:35 PM
Creation date
2/14/2023 3:17:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – JANUARY 17, 2023 8 <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Morast said one of the suggestions by the Rice Creek Watershed District was to have an <br />interpretive trail possibly with fitness equipment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rousseau said they bypass Cummings Park to go to Floral Park because the <br />swings at Cummings are too low for her daughter and other equipment is too high. She would <br />like to see new slides and larger swings at Floral Park. <br /> <br />Mr. Morast stated trails to the hardcourts from the existing trail have been discussed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson would like to see dog waste receptacles and bags at all parks and <br />options for a dog park at Floral Park. <br /> <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said a dog park at Floral Park would be <br />outside of the scope of the current project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Monson thought Arden Manor might be a good place for a community garden. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden said the Rotary wanted to put a community garden in Arden Manor but <br />there wasn’t much positive interest. She also wanted the tennis courts to be built to last. <br /> <br />E. Home Occupations Ordinance Amendment Discussion <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe said this Concept Plan Review was submitted by <br />Kerri Seemann with a request for an ordinance amendment to the City Code for a Class I or Class <br />II Home Occupations which would allow exterior evidence of the home-based business being <br />conducted on the residential property. The applicant’s home-based business would be a <br />landscaping nursery that would include deliveries and/or customers visiting the premise. An <br />application for a Class II Home Occupation application was submitted in December. Staff <br />identified that the CUP submission was incomplete due to the proposed home occupation being <br />primarily exterior of the dwelling with plantings, a retail component, outdoor pickup space for <br />customer orders and an outdoor sales area. City Code requires a home occupation to be conducted <br />entirely within the dwelling and there shall be no exterior evidence of the home occupation. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe stated Ms. Seeman would like the Council to consider <br />a text amendment that would allow home occupations to be conducted outside of the dwelling in <br />an accessory building and/or on the exterior of the dwelling. There were two proposed code <br />amendments provided in the staff report. <br /> <br />Ms. Seemann said she had been growing her own plants and would like the opportunity to sell <br />some of them. She wanted to sell the plants online or through email, deliver them or have the <br />customer pick them up. She explained the changes to City Code she would like to see. She said <br />her property is almost completely surrounded by hedges, so neighbors wouldn’t be able to see <br />what was happening except during the winter when they would be able to see the growing <br />benches. She preferred to grow plants on the benches and not in the ground due to the risk of <br />contamination. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.