My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-23-PC Agenda
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2023
>
03-08-23-PC Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2023 12:01:04 PM
Creation date
3/2/2023 12:00:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Page 3 of 14 <br /> <br />3. Proposed Use <br /> <br />The Applicant is proposing a Minor Subdivision and Variance to split the Subject Property into <br />two residential parcels. As part of the subdivision review, the Applicant is requesting flexibility <br />on setbacks with an evaluation of the lot layout for both parcels in an east and west development <br />pattern to be consistent with existing development along Lake Josephine. Arden Hills Zoning <br />Code defines the lot front yard as the boundary abutting the roadway (i.e. Edgewater Avenue). <br />Mr. Mezzenga’s application narrative is requesting a review of the parcels with the eastern <br />property line as the front yard and the property line abutting Edgewater Avenue considered a side <br />yard. To construct this proposal, the Applicant is seeking three variances based on applicable <br />zoning code definitions and minimum lot standards for lot width, lot depth, and rear yard setback. <br /> <br />City Code Section 1325.04, defines the front lot line as “the boundary of a lot abutting a street” <br />and the rear lot line as “the lot line most nearly parallel to and most remote from the front lot <br />line.” The Applicant is asking the Planning Commission to consider the side of the lot abutting <br />Edgewater Avenue as the side lot line. Mr. Mezzenga has stated this rational for flexibility from <br />this definition would allow future residential dwellings to be built within the proposed building <br />pads without the need for additional setback variances. In his application, the Applicant has <br />included two site plans of the same Minor Subdivision in terms of lot dimensions . Site Plan A <br />displays the potential building pads adhering to setbacks based upon the definitions of “lot” for <br />front, side, and rear yards and with only the variances for lot width and lot depth. Site Plan B <br />displays the proposed building pads with an additional variance from rear yard setbacks to be <br />granted. The Applicant is seeking review and approval of Site Plan B. <br /> <br />Site Plan A – Based on Lot Definitions <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.