My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
02-13-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2023 11:21:25 AM
Creation date
3/14/2023 11:21:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—FEBRUARY 13, 2023 13 <br /> Community Development Director Jagoe explained this sign would have LED lights within the <br /> channel letters. <br /> Mayor Grant inquired if the LED lights would be exposed. <br /> Community Development Director Jagoe indicated the LED lights would be placed behind <br /> acrylic face panels. She noted the proposed lighting met all City standards with respect to the <br /> illumination level. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the westerly facing sign would be illuminated 24/7. <br /> Community Development Director Jagoe commented the applicant did not specify any time <br /> restrictions. She noted the Council could discuss this matter and add a condition as part of the PUD <br /> amendment to regulate the hours this sign could be illuminated. <br /> Councilmember Monson explained when she drove by the property this evening, she saw the <br /> property was already lit. She requested further information on how the site would be further lit. <br /> Community Development Director Jagoe indicated the applicant provided staff with a <br /> photometric plan and reported the proposed illumination could not be more than 1.0 foot candles at <br /> the property line. Per the applicant's plan, the lighting on the building would not be more than 0.12 <br /> foot candles at Snelling Avenue. She reiterated that the proposed sign would meet City sign <br /> standards. <br /> Councilmember Fabel indicated he has been driving by this project and he understood this was a <br /> large senior living facility. He stated he was deeply disappointed that this project did not include <br /> affordable housing. He confirmed from the Findings in the staff report that it is stated this sign <br /> would not result in something inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning district. <br /> Community Development Director Jagoe explained this was one of the Findings brought forward <br /> from the Planning Commission. <br /> Councilmember Fabel stated he understood the Planning Commission reviewed this case and <br /> recommended approval as amended of this case on a 6-0 vote. <br /> Community Development Director Jagoe reported this was correct. <br /> Councilmember Holden explained the Council requested affordable housing with this project but <br /> the State was involved with this project. She commented on how there would be a cooperative <br /> partnership between Bethel University and the senior housing project in order to provide nursing <br /> services to the seniors. She encouraged Councilmember Fabel to speak with Representative Kelly <br /> Moller about this further. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Rousseau opened the public hearing at 8:51 p.m. <br /> Ted Brausen, 1306 West County Road E, stated he built some low income housing in Brainerd and <br /> was not able to complete a similar project in Arden Hills because he could not afford the land. He <br /> stated this company has been a wonderful neighbor and noted he supported their sign requests. He <br /> urged the City Council to reconsider the City's sign ordinance in general. He commented further on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.