My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
05-22-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2023 4:02:39 PM
Creation date
5/18/2023 3:53:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Structure Coverage — Meets Requirements <br />The R-1 District allows for a maximum structure coverage of 25% or 3,517 square feet of the <br />Subject Parcel. The existing structure coverage is 2,556 square feet or 18%. The proposed addition <br />would increase the total structure coverage by 495 square feet for a total of 3,051 square feet, or <br />22% of the Subject Property. <br />2. Variance Review <br />The role of the City Council is to determine and consider how the facts presented to them compare <br />with the city's articulated standards. The Council should base their decision on the facts presented <br />and then apply those facts to the legal standards contained in city ordinances and relevant state <br />law. Neighborhood opinion alone is not a valid basis for granting or denying a variance request. <br />While the City Council may feel their decision should reflect the overall will of the residents, the <br />task in considering a variance request is limited to evaluating how the variance application meets <br />the statutory practical difficulties factors. Residents can often provide important facts that may <br />help in addressing these factors, however, unsubstantiated opinions and reactions to a request do <br />not form a legitimate basis for a variance decision. <br />The City Council may impose conditions when granting variances as long as the conditions are <br />directly related and bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. For <br />instance, if a variance is granted to exceed the side yard setback limit, any conditions attached <br />should presumably relate to mitigating the effect of the encroachment. <br />3. Variance Requirements — Section 1355.04, Subd. 4 <br />The Applicant requests a variance to construct a third stall addition to the side of their existing <br />attached garage that would impede on the required total side yard setback in the R-1 Residential <br />District. The City Council will need to make a determination utilizing the following variance <br />findings and criteria on whether there are practical difficulties with complying with the zoning <br />regulations. If the Applicant does not meet all the factors of the statutory test, then a variance <br />should not be granted. Variances are only permitted when they are in harmony with the general <br />purposes and intent of the ordinance. <br />1. Purpose and Intent. The variance request shall comply with the purpose and intent of the <br />provisions of the City's Zoning Regulations and with the policies of the City's Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br />The variance request for 1475 Dawn Circle is for a proposed garage addition. The Subject <br />Property is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential District and is guided as Low Density <br />Residential on the Land Use Plan. <br />2. Practical Difficulties. The Applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical <br />difficulties in complying with the provisions of the Arden Hills Zoning Regulations. The term <br />"Practical Difficulties" as used in the granting of a variance means: <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.