Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 24, 2023 18 <br />Margie Durhman, 3628 Snelling Avenue North, commented on the buildings on her property. <br />She noted the trees that would be removed were large full grown trees that provide shade to her <br />property. She requested trees be planted along the fence line that will block light and sound as <br />much as possible. <br />AMENDMENT: Mavor Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to <br />add Condition 10 to read: The applicant shall construct a six foot <br />privacy fence on the north property line facing east/west, taking into <br />consideration the wide wires, design to be reviewed by staff along with <br />the applicant and owner of 3628 North Snelling Avenue. <br />Ms. Durhman explained she has two vulnerable adults that live with her and vans visit her <br />property on a regular basis to pick them up for activities. She indicated she needs the vans to be <br />able to make the turn into the driveway without hitting the fence. She commented on the retaining <br />wall that she had in her front yard and stated she did not want this to be disturbed. <br />Mayor Grant clarified that the fence would have to be constructed on the applicants property and <br />would not impede on Ms. Derman's property. He requested further information regarding where <br />the utility pole and guide wires are located. <br />Ms. Durhman reviewed the location of the pole and guide wires near the driveway. She did not <br />anticipate the wires could be moved, but could possibly be incorporated into the new fence. <br />Mayor Grant stated he had thought the guide wires were near the back of the property. <br />Councilmember Holden reported the parking lot would not be installed all the way down to the <br />guide wires. She supported the fence stopping before the guide wires. She then asked staff for <br />further information regarding the lighting plan. <br />Mayor Grant asked if a six foot fence was the maximum height allowed for this property. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe explained six feet was the maximum allowed for <br />residential properties and noted she would have to verify this for commercial properties. <br />Councilmember Holden requested further information regarding the location and height of the <br />exterior light fixtures. <br />Community Development Director Jagoe reported the applicant was proposing to install 14 foot <br />downcast light fixtures and all foot candles were less than .4 onto adjoining properties. <br />Councilmember Monson questioned what the cost would be for a six foot privacy fence that was <br />170 feet long. She understood this cost would be split between the City and the County. <br />Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen indicated he did not have enough <br />information to provide the Council with a rough estimate. <br />