My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-22-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
05-22-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2023 4:02:39 PM
Creation date
5/18/2023 3:53:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 24, 2023 19 <br />Councilmember Monson stated she was concerned with the fact the fence would become a tax <br />burden. She did not believe she could support a 170 foot long privacy fence being installed. She <br />questioned if there was a way to review how long the fence should be in order to properly screen <br />the neighboring residential property. <br />Councilmember Fabel indicated he was surprised to find out Lindey's has not installed a fence in <br />order to screen their business from the neighboring residential property. He stated Lindey's was <br />now getting a brand new fence, which would be at great expense to the public. He did not <br />appreciate that a fence would also be provided to Lindey's in order to make them a good neighbor. <br />Mayor Grant explained he understood this concern. <br />Councilmember Holden indicated the fence would be a much lower cost than the parking lot and <br />she wanted to make sure proper screening was in place between Lindey's and Ms. Durhman. <br />Councilmember Fabel stated it would be his preference if Lindey's would pay for the fence <br />without having this to be done by the public. <br />Mayor Grant commented it would be nice if this could be done, but unfortunately, a condition <br />for approval would be required to ensure the fence was installed. <br />A roll call vote was taken. The amendment carried 3-2 <br />(Councilmembers Monson and Rousseau opposed). <br />A roll call vote was taken. The amended motion carried (5- <br />C. JDA Advisory Committee Request <br />This item was removed from the agenda. <br />11. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />None. <br />12. COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Councilmember Monson commented the fire department was considering a review of going into <br />a fire district. She explained she was working with City Administrator Perrault and the Fire Chief <br />in order to present the Council with further information on this topic in May or June. <br />Councilmember Monson recommended an agenda setting policy be discussed by the Council in <br />May. <br />Councilmember Monson reported the JDA was more than welcoming and she wanted to have <br />comments from the public. She noted the JDA had lots of ideas for open houses and ideas for <br />presentations. She explained she was excited to have this discussion at the May 1 JDA <br />worksession meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.