78-076 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, ""<IfI<.-:~ !"" ~~"-~H'''' ............, , "' ~"''''~'!f.';''.' < 7. On another occasion, Laundervllle kicked the door on one of the City's trucks, brlliakln9~th. 'atch thereof, whIch he did subsequentlyrep~tr on his. own time; . Launderv I,lle took for his own persona I use seven fire brick from a construction site on Indian Oaks Court and transported them In one of the CI~yJs trucks; Laundervllle adlllltted that he had been respon- sible for the foregoing petty thefts; and 10. Laundervllle has In general exemplified a poor attitude towards his Jo.and his fellow employees during the recent years of employ- ment In the Public Works Department of the City, and 9. 8. . . WHEREAS, Laundervlll.e Is currently undergolftg treatment for alcoholism at the Twin Town Treatment Center, which treatment commenced after Laundervllle's susp.nsl.n on October 23, 1978, and WHEREAS, evidence adduced at the hearing tende~ s~rongly to Indicate that Laundervllle's alleged problem with ale-ohalhad little If any calolsal relationship to hIs misconduc:t as an empioyee in the City's Public Works Department, and WHEREAS, Laundervllle admitted to the Council that hie attitude towards his Job and fellow eRiployees was very p~r, and WHEREAS, the moraie of the Pu~llc Works Department employees has suffered greatly as a result of LaundervUle's mlsfe.sance, malfeasance, and nonfeasance as enumerate. above, and WHERE,A~, because of h1~,;;"",htconduct lIS cited above, Laundervllle can no longer, C01lllllan It. "the 'trust of the City Council wh I ch the CO,unc II fee I s must be warranted !!IS to each and every on. of Its emplctyees because of ,the: public nature of each employee's responsibilities, and WHEREAS, Laundervllle's continued employment with the City would tarnish the CIty's Image as custodian or trustee of a pubHc trullt on. behaLf ofeach.end,lilvery one of the :cltlzenswho reside or do business wl~hln the boundaries of the City, and WHEREAS, because the City has such a small emplOYMent group, the shiftIng of Laun~ervl lie to another de~artM.nt of the City would l'Iot be fUsible, would be detrimental and dIsruptive to the morale of the overaliemployment group, al'ld perhaps would be detrlmen.tal to Laundervllle's recovery from his alleged probleM with alconol:, and WHEREAS, It Is thus.Jn the pu~llc Interests ~f the City that Laundervllle no longer continue In the Cltyfsemploy, but the City desires to compensate Laundervllle for accrued vacation tllll8 and compenSlltory tlllle for overtime work and to pay on his behalf premiums fot health' I coverage for two (2), months from the end of November, 1976, . . 3