My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
82-047A/047B
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
82-047A/047B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:27 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:16:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />gutter and essentially the westerly portion of Grey Fox Road was <br />32 feet wide in width, it had concrete curb and gutter but needed <br />some repair, and also needed on one side - it was removed to <br />allow the widening needed to meet M.S.A. standards. Grey Fox <br />Road was a part of the City's M.S.A. improvement program and in <br />the five year improvement program. <br /> <br />The westerly portion - curb and gutter on the south side <br />where it needed to be replaced - new curb and gutter along the <br />north side - this reach right in here, approximately five feet <br />of this street was constructed (inaudible) and a completely new <br />section was constructed in the middle, from this point to Dunlap <br />Street - there was no existing street in that area - that con- <br />sisted of paving, curb and gutter and grading. From this point <br />on it was constructed to a 36 foot width, concrete curb and gutter. <br /> <br />The Grey Fox existing prior to construction was a 32 foot <br />wide street with no concrete curb and gutter. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, when the <br />original feasibility hearing was held, it was estimated that the <br />costs would be $543,900.00 and on an alternative basis, $482,900.00. <br />The actual costs, as it now works out, are $285,790.00. At the <br />time of the feasibility hearing, we projected a 100% assessment <br />and that would have worked out to $110.00 a front foot. At that <br />time we left it open because we wanted to give the worst possible <br />picture and how much might go on general taxes and things like <br />that. <br /> <br />For the hearing tonight, we're recommending that 75% be <br />assessed. That will raise $217,240.12 and the balance will be <br />picked up by City funds - the balance between the $217,240.12 <br />and the $285,790.00. That then makes an assessment rate of $50.00 <br />a front foot instead of $110.00 a front foot that we had originally <br />estimated. There were some properties - a couple of them - that <br />'were assessed in 1970 and were assessed at the rate of $8.42 a <br />foot. Those properties will receive credit for that and they <br />will then be assessed on this project at $41.58 a front foot, <br />where the others that weren't assessed before will be assessed <br />at $50.00 a front foot. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The recommendation is that this be spread over a ten year <br />period of time, with the interest carrying charge at 10.01%, <br />which is roughly 2% less than what other cities are charging, <br />but in view of the interest rate we got on our bond issue earlier, <br />we're recommending that particular rate. ' <br /> <br />Obviously, if the assessment roll is adopted, you have 30 <br />days to prepay without any interest penalty. If not, it will be <br />assessed and start collecting with taxes next year. So 1/10 of <br />the total dollar amount will be collected the first year, to- <br />gether with interest at 10.01%, with a declining amount each year <br />until in the tenth year it's only 1/10, plus 10.01% on that 1/10 <br />principal. They have the right to prepay during that ten year <br />period as well as during the 30 day period immediately after the <br />assessment roll is adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.