My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
82-046
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
82-046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:27 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:16:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: So you could lay it over one week. That is <br />done frequently and I see no objection to it if the Council wishes <br />to do it. On the other hand, just laying it over for the sake of <br />laying it over - if nothing can be accomplished during that one <br />week period, that doesn't particularly suit me personally. But I <br />trust that the Council can evaluate the comments that are made, <br />particularly of opposing counsel, and know that he is doing his <br />job and is giving you a litany of all possible objections. I've <br />done the same thing (inaudible). What it really boils down to - <br />forgetting about the procedure and all the others - we've been <br />along with this process all the way through and I see no irregu- <br />larities in the procedure, no taking of land, no violation of <br />Section 1983 - but one question that it zeroes down to is - is <br />there a benefit? The Council knows that I've always said that to <br />them and we've evaluated all of these proposals. So it's the <br />degree and the amount of the benefit, as the case law says, to <br />the increase in the market value. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Thank you Mr. Popovich. I'll ask a ques- <br />tion of Mr. Christoffersen at this time - are you aware of the <br />property in question that was perhaps over-assessed 100 some feet? <br /> <br />MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: That question would <br />answered under the Grey Fox Road improvement. <br />it has any bearing on this one. <br /> <br />probably be best <br />I don't know that <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: I'll now pass this on to the Council for <br />any comments or questions or for their action. <br /> <br />COUNCILI1AN McALLISTER: <br />all or how much benefit. <br /> <br />(Inaudible) absolutely no benefit at <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: <br />that I've said? Dc <br />fit or no benefit? <br />focus. <br /> <br />Jim, could you address some of the things <br />you think there's any benefit, a partial bene- <br />Because we ought to get the parameters in <br /> <br />MR. STEILEN: A question has been raised that I'd like to <br />address first. I don't have the factual background, but the <br />question was raised as to whether the City of Shoreview has paid <br />the City of Arden Hills $470,000 on behalf of this project and <br />whether that has been deducted from the amount to be assessed <br />against those here tonight on the assessment roll. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Shoreview is assuming that large amount of <br />money - whether it's that exact amount - and it has been deducted. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Just so you know the facts - I'm looking at <br />our original feasibility hearing. The original estimated cost of <br />this project was roughly $1,500,000. Of that, Arden Hills' share <br />was estimated to be $945,000 and it worked out to the figure I <br />gave you earlier - $772,000. The Shoreview portion was $504,000 <br />and it works out to about $400,000 now. They're assessing that <br />in their own city. What we're talking about tonight is the <br />$772,000 that we must raise within our own City, without any <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.