My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
82-046
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
82-046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:27 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 4:16:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />contributions from anyone outside. They're handling their own <br />proportionate assessments. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MAYOR WOODBURN: Just to round out that answer - Ramsey <br />County is also contributing, according to their land, and the <br />State of Minnesota is contributing, according to their land. <br /> <br />MR. STEILEN: I might take a minute to address some of the <br />comments that Mr. Popovich has made. I've always heard that he's <br />one of the more eloquent and crafty speakers among City Councils <br />and as I was sitting there being soothed by his voice, leaning in <br />his direction, I have to admit that that's absolutely true. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Jim, you forget - I wrote this law when I was <br />in the legislature. <br /> <br />MR. STEILEN: Everything I've heard about you is true. How- <br />ever, I don't make any tacit admissions of benefits to my clients' <br />property. I do have great respect for your staff. I think it <br />would be valuable to sit and talk with the City engineer and who- <br />ever else is responsible for spreading the assessments to see if <br />there's room for reasonable men to corne to agreement, but I do <br />want to be on record of making no admissions - tacit or otherwise- <br />that our property - my clients' property - has been benefitted by <br />these improvements, because, to the best of our knowledge, it <br />hasn't. I haven't seen or heard any evidence to the contrary and <br />so I have no basis to make any kind of admission. I don't think <br />that meeting would be a waste of time and I think it would perhaps <br />be fruitful, but I'll leave that to the Council .and its advisors. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN McALLISTER: You said that there's no benefit to <br />the property. <br /> <br />MR. STEILEN: <br />property. I have <br />Ci ty engineer. <br /> <br />As far as I know there is no benefit to the <br />not had the opportunity of talking with the <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN McALLISTER: If that's what you think, then why <br />bother meeting? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, I must <br />comment on what was just said. As your advisor, where there's <br />been no admission of a benefit - we're poles apart - and to sit <br />down and talk, all they want to do is to cross-examine your <br />staff and what have you, preparatory to their filing a lawsuit. <br />I think we ought to fight it in another arena. I would recommend <br />to the Council that you adopt the assessments. <br /> <br />MR. COLESTOCK: I would like to make a comment, enlarging <br />on the remarks made by both counsel. Actually, the occupants of <br />the industrial park are interested - because we're pragmatists <br />to begin with - in sitting down and seeing whether or not there <br />is what can be interpreted as "reasonable settlement" being made. <br />Let's face facts - it costs money to hire an attorney. It cost <br />you money to hire Pete and it cost us money to hire our attorney. <br />It takes a lot of time. We feel, as a group, that if we can sit <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.