Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br />MARCH 25, 2002 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst expressed concern about reconsidering this because it had been previously <br />authorized and the staff had worked hard on this restructuring. Hc asked for further clarification <br />what Councilmember's Aplikowski concerns were. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated she was uncomfortable with the structurc format, and it was <br />too top heavy, which would separate the City Administrator from the employees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem asked for a budgetary breakdown as to what thesc two Directors positions <br />would cost. She indicatcd shc had not becn convinced that the new structure would work. <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Rem indicated that Mr. Moore has had his hands too full, and she believed both <br />of his positions wcrc morc than two part-time positions and should not be one full-time position. <br />She agreed if this new structure was accepted, the City would be too top heavy in managcmcnt. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated if they were going to talk about specific positions, they should do <br />this in a closed session. He indicated this reorganization would providc an extra layer of <br />managcmcnt, which was an expense to the City. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he believed the City Administrator had prcviously provided a cost <br />breakdown of what the expense for these new positions would be, and he believed the City had <br />been functioning as it should be. He stated the Council had previously approved this and he did <br />not believe they shOltld reconsider it. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated he still supported what had been dccided last year and encouraged Council <br />to stay with their original decision. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated her biggest concern was that the City Administrator was <br />separating himself from the rest of the employees. She inquired as to why this was the best way <br />to proceed. Mr. Lyllch replied a lot of discussion had previously gone into this proposal, and that <br />all of the staff had becn consulted with. He indicated this was what staff had agreed to at that <br />time. He stated he would not isolate himself from the rest of staff. He indicated this was not his <br />management style. He stated the rcason for thc two positions was for a greater sense of "team" <br />and to havc two people manage those two areas. He stated all cmployees would meet regltJarly <br />and would know what was going on. It would be up to staff to decide how to schedulc the <br />workload. He stated this would create more of a sense of "team", rather than less. He stated he <br />was listening to the stan; and he did not believe it was fair to do elcvcnth hour reconsideration. <br />He stated his original intcnt was organization by function and management by people who werc <br />available, including him, and to proceed with the dedication of long-range plans for the City. He <br />noted this would undo work that had taken place to date, including union and staff work. Hc <br />indicated staff had made a commitment to the structure and this would undo that commitment. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikov\iski stated they were not undoing anything at this time. She indicated <br />they had in the past brought in a pcrson to do economic development and things did not get done. <br />She stated she wanted to take another look at this. She indicated this \vas not the only way to do <br />the rcstructuring. She stated it would have bcen nice if Council had the opportunity to talk about <br />this and had heard from staff. She stated if the rest of thc Council felt the reorganization was the <br />