My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-06-23 PC Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2023
>
12-06-23 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2024 10:16:07 AM
Creation date
1/4/2024 10:15:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 6, 2023 11 <br /> <br />Chair Vijums stated one of his concerns was that the Commission did not have all of the <br />information. The Commission did not understand how many apartment buildings, luxury homes, <br />single family or big houses would be constructed. He indicated this was concerning to him <br />because he was trying to consider what this would look like. He explained he was torn with the <br />NR-3 and NR-4 areas because he believed 500 units may be too big of an increase. He feared the <br />density was getting too large and noted the traffic studies confirm there were problems with the <br />surrounding intersections before even putting a spade in the ground. He stated if only one of the <br />districts were changed, either NR-3 or NR-4, and the other one remained as is, this could assist <br />with addressing the density and traffic concerns. He encouraged the Commission to consider <br />leaving NR-3 as is and allowing NR-4 to be changed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bjorklund explained he would like to move along with the agenda and allow the <br />public to speak for the public hearing. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums reported he was making a proposal for the Commission to consider, leaving NR-3 <br />as is and allowing NR-4 to be changed as proposed by staff. He stated this change would still <br />provide the affordable housing numbers the City needs to achieve. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collins indicated this would eliminate small multi-family units from NR-3. He <br />wondered how eliminating the three to eight multi-family structures would address the density <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums stated this was the problem because the Commission did not have a high level of <br />detailed information, but he believed this change would impact the density. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber commented the 1,960 was a maximum density level. He anticipated the <br />County did not want to bury its new spine road in cars. He believed there would be moderation. <br />He was of the opinion the density was needed and he did not support the idea of removing multi- <br />family uses from NR-3. He did not believe the density would cause that much of a traffic issue, <br />but rather the design process would ensure the site was not overpopulated. He explained he <br />feared the Commission was encroaching on JDA responsibilities. He trusted that the JDA was <br />well-staffed and he believed they have been doing a good job. He wanted to let the JDA do their <br />job. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collins explained he did not support taking multi-family out of the NR-3 district <br />either. He understood there were valid concerns about traffic, but he believed the multi-family <br />proposal was in line for proper City expansion. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums opened the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. <br /> <br />Chris Hughes, 3515 Snelling Avenue North, thanked the Commission for their candor and <br />discussion. He commented on the report card for the streets noting this information was pre- <br />COVID noting traffic patterns have changed since 2020. He reported the issues that were most <br />concerning to the Commission were noise, pollution, air pollution and traffic. He believed it was <br />great to have these concerns on the table, but noted the item before the Commission was to <br />discuss zoning and comp plan amendments. He then read a prepared statement in full for the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.