My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-06-23 PC Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
PC Minutes 2023
>
12-06-23 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2024 10:16:07 AM
Creation date
1/4/2024 10:15:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 6, 2023 6 <br /> <br />to consider if there were other alternative routes, especially given the fact up to an additional 500 <br />housing units were being added to the development. He questioned if access roads onto Highway <br />10 had been considered. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe commented on the results from the AUAR and stated <br />through mitigation measures that have been identified and the strategies that have been <br />contemplated, specifically to the intersection at County Road 96 and North Heights, the rating for <br />this intersection was a C. She understood that while 500 additional housing units were being <br />added to the development, 300,000 square feet of commercial/flex office space was being <br />removed. She reported the impacts of this change would be further vetted through an updated <br />AUAR. <br /> <br />Chair Vijums stated minor shifts may be made, but he was still concerned with the fact these <br />intersections were currently had a rating of C, D or F before the project has even begun. He asked <br />what other routes could be considered in order to make the Commission more comfortable with <br />the traffic flow to and through this development. He was of the opinion the Commission did not <br />have enough information on the traffic patterns and studies. He believed now was the time to <br />address the traffic concerns or to try to alleviate the traffic concerns. <br /> <br />Commissioner Weber indicated he supported the additional 500 housing units, as well as the <br />removal of the flex office space. However, he was concerned about the southwest corner. He <br />explained he lived along Highway 10 and it was very loud. He commented on how he opposed <br />the North Heights Church development because they would have a difficult time mitigating the <br />noise from Highway 10. He reported he would like to see a noise wall being paid for by the City <br />and the County in order to buffer Highway 10 noise from the new housing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collins clarified the NR-3 and NR-4 designations were being revised to allow for <br />the increased density. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe reported this was the case. She commented further <br />on the proposed changes for the NR-3 and NR-4 designations. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collins questioned what the nature of the NR-4 designation was. He asked if a <br />height restriction was in place for the NR-4 designation. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe explained the NR-4 district would be guided by the <br />Town Center regulations. She indicated the building heights that would be allowed are similar to <br />TC-3 which would be four or five stories. <br /> <br />Commissioner Collins asked staff for what development might look at the density proposed for <br />NR-3 and NR-4. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jagoe explained a visualization of density was provided in <br />the staff report. She reported these examples of existing Arden Hills neighborhoods with five <br />units per acre or ten units per acre. She noted additional visuals were provided from New <br />Brighton and Shoreview that depicted 20 to 50 units per acre, as well as the 50 to 75 units per <br />acre. She commented on the Twin Lakes project that was recently completed in Roseville. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.