My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 03-26-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC 03-26-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:35 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 1:45:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 26,2001 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Mr. Doughty asked if the Council was concerned about the looks or the performance. Mayor <br />Probst responded they are not talking about office showroom space. He stated they have both <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated there could only belO percent EFIS on a multi-story. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated they just want brick. She noted a lot of brick buildings are <br />going up in New Brighton. She added she does not have a problem with 10% EFIS on multi- <br />story building. She stated she does have concerns on a lower building. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson asked what is the likelihood they would have a stand alone building of <br />6,000 square feet. Mr. Carlson responded it would be pretty small. He stated there would only <br />be one if it were a requirement of a large corporate user. He noted they are trying to think <br />proactively and eliminate reasons to say no. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated he would rather they go higher and have them come back and say <br />this user needs this. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson asked what was the concern about having a building that size. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated it moves away from the whole idea to have a high-class office <br />building. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson stated that in the best of all worlds he hears what they are saying. He noted however <br />in corporate settings, developments of this size have need for compatible uses. <br /> <br />Mr. Doughty stated it is also taken from a bank use. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson stated that a bank use is an allowable use in this process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated it seems to be something more incorporated in a bigger building. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst states there would be no issue with allowing a smaller building once they know <br />what it would be used for. He noted Medtronic has a daycare facility separate from its office. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson stated in concept the only reason to do it would be to meet a compatibility <br />requirement some users have. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated if it is a daycare center or convenience and fits into the development he <br />would be happy to see it. He noted sometimes when they establish design standards the outcome <br />is driven lower rather than higher. <br /> <br />Mr. Shardlow stated they could make it a permitted use only if it is tied to a larger campus. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.