My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-10-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC 09-10-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:37 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 1:45:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 10,2001 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson stated Councilmember Grant had a legitimate concern. He noted it <br />looked foolish for the Council to approve a plan that shows this kind of pond. He added they <br />needed to indicate that the city considered this issue. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion <br />to extend the meeting by 15 minutes. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated he wanted to remove the word pond. <br /> <br />Mr. Leaf stated it was important to get this plan to the agency review stage. He stated he viewed <br />this issue as a minor change. He noted the contradiction in the language should be viewed as <br />highlighting the flexibility. He added the feasibility stage of the process would evaluate whether <br />there should be a pond or another item. <br /> <br />Councilmember Rem stated she agreed that there should be text changes. She suggested a more <br />generic word like project. She noted she agreed it would be good to get the plan out to the <br />necessary agencies. She added her concern that the longer this language remained in the plan the <br />more it became a precedent that was expected to be followed. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Mayor Probst moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a motion to <br />amend the plan to add a footnote to table 7 that states "The plan anticipates <br />stormwater activities at all locations and has used a pond approach for the <br />purposes of cost estimates. This should in no way be interpreted as a commitment <br />by the city to utilize a pond at all these locations, especially where private <br />property is involved or in the case of Valentine Park." The motion carried <br />unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Aplikowski seconded a <br />motion to authorize the forwarding of the agency review draft of the Stormwater <br />Management Plan to the necessary agencies including the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District, subject to those changes indicated above and other applicable changes. <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS <br /> <br />Mr. Lynch stated he would represent the City in Conciliation Court. He noted a driver ran into <br />one of the City's snowplows. He added the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust turned <br />down this claim. He stated the other driver was seeking damages in Conciliation Court. He <br />noted the driver had attempted to go around a snowplow. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> <br />Mayor Probst stated some of the Councilmembers had been directing staff in the Public Works <br />Department to do specific work assignments. He noted the Council had discussed this issue and <br />had agreed that this would be done only in cases dealing with immediate safety issues for the <br />public. He added the Council owes it to the Administrator to go though him so that he <br />understands what has been asked of his staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.