Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br /> DECEMBER 10, 2001 5 <br /> . He described the landscaping. He added the applicant has agreed to provide a 6-foot board on <br /> board fence along the northern property line to provide additional screening. He stated the city <br /> received two letters from residents that expressed some concern about the screening. He noted <br /> the Neighborhood Business zoning district requires 30 foot buffer yard. He added they meet that <br /> on the eastern portion of the property. He stated they meet approximately half of that requirement <br /> on the northern boundary. He noted staff suggested decorative lighting. He added the applicant <br /> has requested two 30-foot square foot signs. He stated this meets the total square footage <br /> requirements, but exceeds the total number of signs permitted. <br /> Mr. Parrish noted before construction a revised drainage and utility plan would need to be <br /> submitted for approval to the City Engineer to take into account some of the drainage issues. He <br /> added the Neighborhood Business District calls for faced brick, stone, glass, or natural wood <br /> product. He stated the applicant has proposed a faced brick or stone for the base material. He <br /> noted the applicant has proposed for the main material to be the higher-grade stucco, which is a <br /> deviation. <br /> He described the sidewalk requirements proposed by the Planning Commission. He stated this is <br /> a gateway property to Arden Hills and the applicant has proposed a sign easement for that <br /> purpose. He noted the applicant agreed to provide a bike rack. He added the Planning <br /> Commission evaluated this plan. He stated there was a unanimous recommendation for approval. <br /> . Mr. Steve Nelson stated he had discussed with a concerned resident some additional screening. <br /> He noted they are trying to work this plan into the neighborhood and therefore stepped back the <br /> second floor. He added they feel the acrylic finish would be attractive and durable. He stated they <br /> feel it would be more residential in style. <br /> Councilmember Grant asked about the proposed material since it is not allowed in this type of <br /> district. Mr. Nelson responded it is a very high quality and attractive material utilized in Bear <br /> Path. He stated it was not a flat finish. <br /> Councilmember Grant asked ifit was EFIS. Mayor Probst responded it was not EFIS, but a true <br /> acrylic finish. <br /> Mr. Mark Maguire, 2030 Glenn Paul, noted he had a letter from three residents. He stated his <br /> biggest concern is the setback variances for the building and the parking lot. He noted he <br /> understood the city has eased these requirements. He added this needed to be addressed. He <br /> stated he was concerned about the privacy lost due to building having an upper level. He noted <br /> the neighborhood had been there several years. He added he was not opposed to this being <br /> developed, but would like a one story building. He stated that too big of a building resulted in <br /> traffic issues. <br /> He noted there was a lot of water draining in the ditch. He added ifit clogged there could be a <br /> . serious problem. He stated that has been a problem in the past without the water from this <br /> parking lot. He noted they did not want flooded basements, garages and yards. He stated they <br /> would like to know the impact on the neighborhood from the pollution. <br />