My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 12-10-2001
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
CC 12-10-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:38 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 1:46:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br /> DECEMBER 10,2001 6 <br /> . He noted there was an old gas station on the site and pollution in the ground. He added he would <br /> like a good impact study on this to show that the neighborhood would not be impacted. He stated <br /> his concern about lights. <br /> Mr. Maguire stated some ofthe neighbors did not receive a notice. He noted they were concerned <br /> there was not enough time to prepare. He added they had solutions they felt would be acceptable. <br /> He stated they would like to reduce it to a one-story building. He noted they would like an 8-foot <br /> or higher privacy fence. He added the six-foot fence on the property line would in reality be only <br /> 4 foot high. He stated the sidewalk would onlybel0 feet from the fence that looked into the <br /> property. He noted that if the fence is placed on the retaining wall, they would have an 8 foot <br /> fence. He added he would accept a fence 8 or 10 foot hedge on the retaining wall. He stated it <br /> would like pine or cedar so one could not see through it in the wintertime. <br /> He noted he would like the City to require the snow to be removed off site. He added if the snow <br /> is pushed into the ditch, it would be a huge issue. He stated there has already been flooding of the <br /> property in the past. He noted he would like to be assured by stipulation that this would not <br /> interfere with their drainage. He added he did not want to be responsible to pay for any drainage <br /> problem crated by this development. He stated he would like to see a pollution impact study and <br /> a light study. He noted he would not like to see any manipulation of the site plan. He added he <br /> . did not want any open issues or confusion in the end. <br /> He stated the neighbors did not have enough notice about this project. He noted that over a year <br /> ago, the developer talked to some of the neighbors. He added no one has talked to them in the <br /> last year. He stated the neighbors are very serious about this and hopefully the city would not <br /> take this lightly. He noted they would do whatever they have to do to stop this proj ect. He <br /> thanked the Council for listening. He stated he hoped the developer could come up with <br /> something attractive for the City, but more acceptable to the neighborhood. He noted the City <br /> should not just throwaway the setback requirements. <br /> Mr. Don Ristow, 2033 County Road D, stated he was at the Council meeting a year and a half <br /> ago. He noted there were problems so the Council delayed the project. He added Mr. Nelson did <br /> call him to tell him about the December 5,2001 meeting. He stated he could not get a substitute <br /> teacher with one-day notice for a class he taught. He noted he has not heard anything for the last <br /> year and a half. He added he assumed that the City had dropped the case. <br /> Mr. Ristow noted that before he bought his house he asked the property owner about building a <br /> Tom Thumb on this site. He added the owner stated they would not build one because of the <br /> contamination underground. He stated his wife talked to somebody from the City before they <br /> bought the house. He noted she was told there was a 100-foot buffer between the house and what <br /> could be built on the site. He stated they knew the woods would not be on their property, but <br /> were told the woods could not be taken down. <br /> . He noted his house was recently appraised at $160,000. He added he built fire pits, decks and put <br /> a lot of money into the home. He stated with a two story building there it would reduce home <br /> values and eliminate his privacy. He questioned whether he would have any sun in his backyard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.