Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES <br /> DECEMBER 10, 2001 8 <br /> . dumping yard for all the neighbors. He noted they are going to dig out the ditch, regrade it, and <br /> reset it. He added that there is going to be a perforated pipe set in the bottom of the ditch. He <br /> stated it would be covered with river rock over it so that it would be used if needed for drainage. <br /> He noted it would allow water to drain out of that ditch. He added this approach has been used <br /> in these kinds of situations before. <br /> He stated this lot has always been impervious surface. He noted it had been a gas station. He <br /> added the water did drain to the north based on prior design and layout. He stated that if the ditch <br /> has been blocking up that is due in part to being blocked with yard waste. He noted it has a 21- <br /> inch drain. He added there has to be a lot of water to block it. <br /> Mr. Nelson stated the other homes have garages in the back as well. He noted each of these <br /> houses have detached garages across the back. He added the parking lot would start 18 feet from <br /> the westerly side and run 81 feet. He stated it went halfway across the neighbor's property. He <br /> noted the neighbor's garage ends up right in the middle ofthe next door garage. He showed an <br /> illustration. He stated there will also be a masonry stone receptacle that would block the view <br /> from the other parking area. He noted that it is primarily the garage area where the parking area <br /> would be located. <br /> Mr. Nelson noted that with respect to the issues regarding pollution control, they did get closure. <br /> . He stated there is contamination in the southwest comer, where there was a pump island. He <br /> noted there is some contamination in the ground water. He added when they build, they would <br /> have an environmental engineer on site from pollution control to test the soil that is removed. He <br /> stated if the removed soil is found to be contaminated they would have to treat it and store it <br /> separate from the uncontaminated soil. He noted they would have to cover the soil and decide <br /> what to do. He added it is his understanding that there is no contamination on the easterly side. <br /> He stated he felt they did not have to do anything there. He noted they would still have the <br /> environmental engineer on site to test it. <br /> Mr. Nelson added that with respect to lighting the property directly to the west throws out more <br /> light. He stated that property almost lights up the whole parking lot. He noted he had questioned <br /> the need for lights at all. He added he was told they needed to have lights in the parking lot <br /> according to the City Code. He stated they had planned on a 14- foot shoebox light because it <br /> would cut off the light from spreading. He noted the city has asked them to use more decorative <br /> lighting so they are looking for a decorative light that would cut off the light the same way. He <br /> added they planned to the light in the parking lot so there would only be one fixture. He stated <br /> then it would not be 35 feet up like what was used across the street. <br /> Mr. Nelson stated that with respect to notice, he felt bad that Mr. Ristow did not feel that he <br /> received notice. He added when he talked to Mr. Ristow, Mr. Ristow told him the letter had been <br /> received, but put aside and forgotten. He stated he told Mr. Ristow about the Planning <br /> Commission meeting. He noted he offered to meet with Mr. Ristow on several occasions. He <br /> . added he told Mr. Ristow he would be at the Planning Commission meeting one half hour early, <br /> but Mr. Ristow did not come. He stated he tried to meet with Mr. Ristow several other times. <br />