Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — NOVEMBER 27, 2023 18 <br />Councilmember Holden recommended the moratorium be in place for up to one year. She stated <br />this would allow staff more flexibility. She asked if a six month moratorium could be extended, <br />should the need arise. <br />City Administrator Perrault reported a six month moratorium could be extended, or a year long <br />moratorium could be ended early. He agreed a one year moratorium could be put in place and that <br />it be ended if the Council were able to wrap this item up prior to 365 days. <br />Councilmember Monson stated she could support a one year moratorium with the understanding <br />it would end if Council were able to wrap this item up prior to the one year timeline. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to direct <br />staff to put a one year moratorium in place for new tobacco licenses in the <br />City of Arden Hills, <br />City Attorney Schmidt requested the Council provide staff with direction on what they were to <br />study and what official controls staff should be investigating. <br />MOTION AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a <br />motion to direct staff to put a one year moratorium in place for <br />new tobacco licenses in the City of Arden Hills directing staff to <br />study the number of licenses, zoning areas, fee schedule and <br />violation fees. <br />Councilmember Fabel recommended the impact of the proposed moratorium also be considered <br />and how future businesses in Arden Hills would be impacted. <br />Councilmember Holden stated staff could be directed to consider this as well but noted this <br />would be an abstract concept to measure. <br />Councilmember Fabel explained he would be abstaining from voting given the procedure the <br />Council was following. <br />The amended motion carried 3-0-1 (Councilmember Fabel <br />abstained). <br />12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />None. <br />13. COUNCIL COMMENTS <br />Councilmember Monson explained the public asked about the number of housing units and if <br />the number would go up or down. She reported the 1,960 was a proposed number. She <br />commented if this number needed to change this would be considered by the JDA. She stated she <br />could not be certain, but she did not anticipate the number would go up. <br />