Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br /> <br />,e.:RDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 14~1995 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone indicated the City has looked at this situation by the total amount of benefit <br />divided by the total number of homes in the association. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski inquired if the reduction was used, how much would this reduce the per <br />lot assessment. Mr. Stonehouse indicated it would reduce this by approximately $18.00. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski indicated the issue is not the money, but the principle. She indicated <br />she would feel better by staying with the policy. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst indicated he originally was the one to raise the issue of the comer lots, and in <br />reviewing, Staffhas realized the comer lot formula was used on two comer lots, but not on the two <br />outlot comers. He indicated he would be comfortable with looking at the reduction for lack of a <br />better example. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired if the formula were used in the original calculations, would this <br />mean a different per foot rate. Mr. Stonehouse indicated this would result in a slightly higher per <br />foot rate, taking the overall cost of the property into consideration. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst noted procedurally, the Council needs to address the issue of the appeals. <br /> <br />City Attorney Filla indicated all the appeals are based on the comer lot formula issue and following <br />City Policy in regards to this calculation. <br /> <br />Mr. Filla indicated in regard to precedent, the Council will have flexibility and may wish to evaluate <br />in future reconstruction projects. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone reiterated the policy is setup as a guideline. He suggested taking the typical <br />dimensions of a lot in Arden Hills and using this for the calculation of a phantom lot for the outlots, <br />since there is no home on the outlots. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst indicated the Council could choose to reduce the footage by 317.9 or by 200 feet <br />reflecting the calculation of a phantom lot. <br /> <br />Mr.Bob Porter, 1128 Benton Way, indicated the association does not own the outlot, each member <br />owns 1/68 of the outlots. He reiterated the residents wish the outlots to be treated as any other comer <br />lot. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst inquired if the Council accepted the appeals, what would the effect be. Mr. Filla <br />indicated if the appeals were accepted, in principle, the Council would be accepting an adjustment. <br />He did note one of the objections by the Hunter's Park Association was not signed and was, <br />therefore, not accepted. <br />