Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.. <br />. <br /> <br />.MillEN lllLLS CITY COUNCIL - AUGUST 14. 1995 <br /> <br />8, <br /> <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to deny the objections to the assessment <br />roll presented by: <br /> <br />Robert Porter 1128 Benton Way <br />Frank S. Pistotnik 1163 Benton Way <br />Robert and Ruth Hopkins 1183 Benton Way <br />Stephen and Elizabeth ForesteIl1190 Benton Way <br />Tom and Pegi Harness 1123 Benton Way <br />Clifford and Bernice Dahlberg 1129 Benton Way <br />Roger Carlson 1193 Benton Way <br />Steve and Jody Parupsky 1127 Benton Way <br />Julia and Timothy Gilsrud 1125 Benton Way <br />James Lym 1187 Benton Way <br />Terry Maroney 1130 Benton Way <br />Carol Wahi 1133 Benton Way <br />Gary and Jane Getty 1188 Benton Way <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski inquired as to why Council should consider denying the appeals. <br />CounciImember Hicks felt the first assessment was appropriate because the comer lot formula was <br />used on the single family comer lots. <br /> <br />Motion failed with 2-2-1 vote. (Mayor Probst and CounciImember Keim opposed and <br />CounciImember Aplikowski abstained.) <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Keim moved and Hicks seconded a motion to accept the objections to the assessment <br />roll presented by: <br /> <br />Robert Porter 1128 Benton Way <br />Frank S. Pistotnik 1163 Benton Way <br />Robert and Ruth Hopkins 1183 Benton Way <br />Stephen and Elizabeth ForesteIl1190 Benton Way <br />Tom and Pegi Harness 1123 Benton Way <br />Clifford and Bernice Dahlberg 1129 Benton Way <br />Roger Carlson 1193 Benton Way <br />Steve and Jody Parupsky 1127 Benton Way <br />Julia and Timothy Gilsrud 1125 Benton Way <br />James Lym 1187 Benton Way <br />Terry Maroney 1130 Benton Way <br />Carol Wahi 1133 Benton Way <br />Gary and Jane Getty 1188 Benton Way <br /> <br />Motion carried 3-2 (CounciImember Malone and Hicks opposed). <br />