My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-11-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CC 09-11-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:41 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:13:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br /> <br />,MID.EN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SE~1:EMBER 11, 1995 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Ms. Holmes expressed concern regarding net density, the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and <br />Easement in her memo to the Council. <br /> <br />Ms. Doris c..nniff, 3946 Glenview, expressed concern regarding that by building on the site those <br />buyers who purchase homes may have problems. She was afraid the City would have to cover the <br />cost, if the development is not successful. <br /> <br />Ms. Canniff indicated the residents wish for the area to stay the same. She feels the site is not <br />appropriate for building, but is more of a swamp like or wetland area <br /> <br />Mr. Roger Aiken, 4360 Hamline, felt the EA W was inadequate and an EIS was necessary. <br /> <br />Mr. Aiken felt pertinent information was not addressed in the EA W, such as; wildlife concerns, <br />traffic, future impact, etc. He did not believe some questions were resolved, such as control of the <br />private road, pipe/culvert responsibilities, etc. <br /> <br />Mr. Aiken felt in the Staffs report, they mentioned upholding the Shoreland Requirements, but he <br />believed the minimum lot size of20,000 square feet and 30% density should also be upheld. <br /> <br />Mr. Aiken felt the watershed area had been changed, which has not been reviewed. <br /> <br />Mr. Aiken urged the Council to delay their decision. <br /> <br />Ms. Sharon Turgeon, 1777 Venns Avenue, indicated she had previously addressed the Planning <br />Commission regarding this issue. She felt there should be an archaeological study of the site. She <br />noted the Minnesota Historical Society recommended that a site survey be taken. She believes this <br />site has good potential for unreported properties because it is near a lake and settlements are known <br />to be on hilltops. <br /> <br />Ms. Turgeon noted this survey would not be drastic and the cost most likely under $2,000. She felt <br />this issue should be addressed before the hilltop is removed. <br /> <br />Mr. Joe V odonik, 1723 Glenview, expressed concern for the lake levels and flooding. He inquired <br />who would take the responsibility should the site flood after development. <br /> <br />Hilda Reynold, 1645 Glenview Court, indicated the site flooded twice last year. She noted more <br />trees will be removed and there will be less to absorb the water. <br /> <br />Ms. Billie Schacht, 1683 West County Road F, inquired if the property is owned by Mr. Ogren or <br />is the ownership still pending. She also asked if the Council was listening to the comments and <br />concerns of the residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.