CC 11-13-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I. ,NIDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 13. 1995 6 I more clear it could be stated, "The Northwest comer of Unit 6 will be at least 24.5 feet from the 66 foot easement". I Mr. Jay Shrankler, 1748 Venus Avenue, indicated the Council gave the applicant direction at I the last Council meeting on October 30,1995. Mr. Shrankler asked if the Council now feels comfortable with modifications. Mayor Probst indicated Council has reviewed an interim plan and the plan addressed their concerns. I Councilmember Hicks noted the street has been widened and the nwnber of units have been reduced, to provide a more open development. I Mr. Ringwald also noted there will also be a catch basin located on the Southwest comer of the property to provide for treatment of all run off from the property. I Dr. Bob Mullin, 1793 Gramsie Road, asked about the conservation easement, in regard to "be allowed to return to natural vegetation". Mr. Ringwald indicated the developer would re- I vegetate with natural vegetation that part of the easement which was disturbed due to grading, within 14 days after the completion of the grading of the area. I- Ms. Bobbi Schatz, 1683 West County Road F, inquired as to the removal of the hill on the site. Mr. Ringwald described the earthwork that would take place on the site. I Councilmember Hicks inquired for clarification if there is any drainage away from the site to Valentine Lake. Mr. Stonehouse indicated there is no drainage into Valentine Lake from this I site. Ms. Turgeon asked if a Landscape Plan had been provided. Also, she asked how the City Code I was applied to this case. Mr. Ringwald indicated a Landscape Plan had been reviewed and shown and approved with the Site Plan/PUD Master Plan. Mr. Ringwald noted at least from the Staff level they had addressed the code in regard to a Single Family Attached Home I development. Mayor Probst indicated a Planned Unit Development is allowed under City Code and Council I addressed this case as Single Family Attached development. Mayor Probst noted this would be the final action by the Council in regard to this development. I Councilmember Aplikowski complimented the citizens involved in this case for all their research I and hard work. She reminded the residents that the Council needed to review the rights of all involved, including the property owner and their right to develop their land. I- Councilmember Aplikowski indicated although it may not be the opinion of all, she feels the development will be a benefit to the community in the future. I