My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 11-13-1995
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CC 11-13-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:41 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:13:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I. ARDEN lllLLS CITY COUNCIL - NOVEMBER 13, 1995 7 <br />I <br /> Ms. Lois Rem, 1670 Glenview Court, indicated the reason for the questions from the residents <br />I was that they wanted the Council to be comfortable with their decision. <br />I Ms. Rem provided a letter to be entered in the record as Exhibit 6.c. She requested an <br /> explanation as to how the Ogren development would have gotten from the March plan, approved <br /> by Staff & Planning Commission, to its current state without the high level of involvement by <br />I the residents. <br /> Mayor Probst indicated the original plan was not approved in March, it had not been reviewed by <br />I the Council until October 10, 1995 where Council established conditions for approval. <br /> Mayor Probst expressed great concern for the notion there was something a-miss with the <br />I protocol of this application and that there was more than simply a Planned Unit Development <br /> request involved. <br />I Mayor Probst indicated he felt the Council had reached a compromise between the developer and <br /> the residents. He indicated although not all agree, there is a basic right to develop your land, <br />.- This right can not be ignored. <br /> Motion carried nnanimously (5-0). <br />I Resolution #95-78. Ordering Prelim.inarv Feasibility Report in the Matter ofthe 1996 <br /> Street Im1}rovement Project <br />I City Engineer, Greg Stonehouse indicated the street re-rating was now complete. He provided <br /> the Council with a prioritized list of streets as compiled in accordance with the project schedule <br />I and under the direction of Public Works Superintendent Stafford, <br /> Mr. Stonehouse indicated under the new system, streets with PCI ratings less than 60 will require <br />I reconstruction or cold, in-place recycling; street ratings from 61 to 80 will be best maintained <br /> with a bituminous overlay; ratings form 81 to 90 will require a seal coat; and those rated above <br /> 90 will require no maintenance in the next two to three years. <br />I Mr. Stonehouse indicated a general Feasibility Study will be completed to outline the necessary <br />I improvements and associated costs for streets within the first and second priority categories. <br /> This will allow City staff to hold informational meetings with the public in the next several <br /> weeks to determine which streets will be reconstructed/rehabilitated in 1996. Following those <br />I informational meetings, Staff would revise the Feasibility Study specifically toward the selected <br /> streets, and schedule the formal Public Hearing to allow the project to proceed. <br />Ie <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.