My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-17-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CC 02-17-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:43 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:24:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />.' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />MINUTES <br />CJ:'l'Y OF ARDEN BJ:LLS, MINBESOTA <br />WORKSESSJ:ON <br />February 17, 1994 <br />4:30 P.M. - city Hall - Conference Room <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Acting Mayor Probst <br />called to order the City Council worksession at 5:15 p.m. <br />Present: Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, and Paul <br />Malone. Mayor Sather arrived at 5:20 p.m and presided over <br />the remainder of the meeting. Absent: councilmember Dale <br />Hicks. Also present were: City Accountant, Terry Post; <br />Community Planning Coordinator, Brian Fritsinger; Park & <br />Recreation Director, Cynthia Severtson, City Administrator, <br />Dorothy Person; and Recording Secretary, Renee Kaulfuss. <br /> <br />ADOPT AGENDA <br /> <br />MOTJ:ON: <br /> <br />Aplikowski moved, seconded by Malone, to adopt the <br />February 17, 1994 worksession agenda as submitted. <br />Motion carried unanimously (3-0). <br /> <br />AND4AL CONTROL UPDATE <br /> <br />Staff reviewed the proposed changes to the ordinance and pointed <br />out that the city Attorney had not yet reviewed the draft <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />The key areas added were in regards to cats, exotic animals and <br />kennels. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone questioned the wording and meaning of <br />Section 5-33. The question being the definition of a public <br />place and how it applies to animals in the yard of the owner. He <br />further offered the suggestion to use different terminology such <br />as domestic animals rather than the words dog and cat. <br /> <br />The Council was supportive of adding cats to the ordinance. A <br />brief discussion on the number of cats per household was held, <br />however, no specific number was offered or action taken. <br /> <br />In Division 6 Kennels; the Council discussed the issue of the <br />number of dogs and the age of the dogs. Staff indicated the <br />number of dogs are limited to three (3) per household. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.