My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 02-17-1994
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CC 02-17-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:43 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:24:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />~ <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />February 17, 1994 <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding section 5-74 (c) and the zoning <br />requirement for kennels. The Council indicated that the R-2 <br />zoning district be added to this definition. <br /> <br />The council considered it acceptable and directed staff to review <br />the ordinance with the City Attorney. No specific date was <br />established for review at a Council meeting. <br /> <br />D:ISCUSS:ION - TRANS:IENT MERCJm:NTS <br /> <br />Staff reviewed the proposed changes and pointed out that the city <br />Attorney had not yet reviewed these proposed changes. <br /> <br />The Council questioned the effect of the ordinance on non-profit <br />organizations, such as, the Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts, and other <br />related associations. Staff will check with the city Attorney. <br />They also asked how this ordinance would effect religious groups <br />canvassing in the area. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding the "No Sunday" solicitation. <br />Council indicated that Sundays should be allowed. Staff will <br />include Sunday solicitation. <br /> <br />The idea of charging a fee was discussed. The Council indicated <br />that, as long as, the fees are directly associated with the costs <br />for a background check, it would be appropriate to charge a fee. <br /> <br />A question was raised as to Section 18.11 and it's impact under <br />the Sign Ordinance. Staff will review and report back to Council <br />at a later date. <br /> <br />Council concurred to have the City Attorney review the proposed <br />changes and directed staff to bring back to them the Attorney's <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />EVEREST GROUP UPDATE <br /> <br />Staff outlined the anticipated contents of the agreement from <br />Everest. Staff discussed some possible methods of reducing the <br />risk to the city through letters of credits, guaranteed <br />construction, etc. <br /> <br />Discussion followed relating to TIF financing, improvement costs, <br />bond issue costs, and future development in general of Arden <br />Hills including the TCAAP property. Further discussion took <br />place pertaining to the possibility of consolidating with a <br />neighboring city and the use of citizen surveys. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.