Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br /> <br />ARDEN Hll.LS CITY COUNCll. - JULY 25, 1994 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />erosion have not been successful. <br /> <br />Staff is proposing that grant funding be used to eliminate the erosion problem by leveling off <br />the entire site. The configuration of the site would be changed to include four ball fields <br />with the parking area near the entrance of the park. Ball fields would not overlap, and <br />parking spaces would be increased from 80 spaces to 100 spaces. The play area would be <br />moved adjacent to New Brighton Road next to the warming house. The warming house and <br />hockey rinks would remain as they are today. The driveway would not be moved, and the <br />trees along New Brighton Road would remain. <br /> <br />Mr. David Sand, Chair of the Park and Recreation Committee, introduced other members <br />of the Committee who were present: Megan Ricke, Lynette Kreidler and Dorothy McOung. <br />He stated that for years the Committee has hoped to find a way to increase the number of <br />ball fields in the City to accommodate the tremendous need. It was hoped that the arsenal <br />property would be opened, but year after year the arsenal property is not available. With the <br />need for safe, accessible ball fields in the City, Perry Park is a natural choice because it is <br />the closest thing the City has to a community park. It is used by more softball teams than <br />any other park in the City and lends itself to the proposed adjustments. With this pinwheel <br />layout effect, the park will be safer, offer additional parking, and add lights to two ball fields <br />which would extend the playing time. Four layouts were considered, and this one is the best <br />use of the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Sand stated that the City's contribution to the cost of the redevelopment of Perry Park <br />is contingent upon receipt of the grant award. The City would match the amount of the <br />grant. If the grant is not sufficient to cover the costs of the proposed improvements, the <br />Committee will address the issue at that time. He commended Ms. Severtson for her hard <br />work and hopes the grant application will be successful. . <br /> <br />Hicks asked if the plan addresses erosion and if surface water could be converted into piping. <br /> <br />Ms. Severtson stated that with redevelopment, a storm sewer would be put in with curbs and <br />gutters. That work is already included in the price estimate. Erosion will be addressed by <br />leveling the site so the water can be channeled. <br /> <br />Hicks asked the rationale for the granting agency to fund this project. <br /> <br />Ms. Severtson stated that reasons to fund these improvements include: alleviating safety <br />hazards, compliance with ADA requirements, prevention of soil erosion and the extended use <br />of ball fields with lighting. <br /> <br />Fritsinger stated that one of the criteria considered by the State is the amount of activity and <br />usage by the residents of the community. This is a unique situation where the school has its <br />recreation programs at this park site. That will be a factor of consideration. It also has <br />more activity than a neighborhood park. <br />