Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rJ <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />.e <br />. <br /> <br />ARDEN HILL~ CITY COUNCIL - JULY 25, 1994 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />Mayor Probst noted that the proposed resolution must be included with the grant application. <br />He asked if anyone would like to speak in opposition or offer any further comment. .There <br />was no further comment, and Mayor Probst closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION: by Malone, seconded by Aplikowski, to adopt Resolution No. 94-40 certifying <br />that the City of Arden Hills may enter into an agreement with the State of <br />Minnesota for the above-referenced project, and to execute the DPI'P4l"'"}' <br />agreements to apply for the grant. <br />The motion carried (4-0). <br /> <br />CASE NO. 94-18. MCCLUNG FOURTH ADDmON - FINAL PLAT <br /> <br />Fritsinger stated that Mr. McClung has submitted a final plat for a nine-lot single family <br />subdivision, McClung Fourth Addition. The plat is in compliance with the subdivision <br />ordinance. The Planning Commission approved the final plat, subject to City review of all <br />documents. Staff is working on preparation of the Developer Agreement. Building <br />specifications have been completed and reviewed by the City Engineer who has indicated that <br />everything is in order. The City Attorney has reviewed the abstract title which is also in <br />order. <br /> <br />The contract with the developer would require two lots set aside as security for completion of <br />the project. Upon a letter from the City Engineer indicating satisfactory completion, the two <br />lots would be released back to the applicant for development. <br /> <br />One other item is that the developer will be maintaining the street during the winter. A <br />certificate of occupancy will not be issued until a letter is received from the City Engineer <br />indicating that the road improvements are satisfactory. <br /> <br />Malone noted that the lots are oddly and irregularly shaped with substantial drainage <br />easements. It is to be noted that the irregularities and required drainage easements are not to <br />be considered on their own as evidence of hardship for future variances. He also requested <br />that the developer pay particular attention to the utility trenches to avoid any settlement. <br /> <br />Hicks asked which two lots will be held by the City as security. Fritsinger answered, Lot <br />Nos. I and 2. He concurred with Councilmember Malone's statement that the drainage <br />easement and wetland delineation not be sufficient evidence of hardship in the future for <br />consideration of variances. <br /> <br />MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks to approve the final plat for the McClung <br />Fourth Addition, subject to fifla1i:nltion of the development contract, noting the <br />somewhat odd-shaped lots and drainage easements that are not to be <br />considered in and of themselves evidence of hardship for future variances. <br />The motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br />