Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rJ <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.e <br />I <br /> <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 25, 1994 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />CASE NO. 94-17 - CPI - SITE PLAN REVIEW <br /> <br />Fritsinger stated that the site plan review has been submitted for the CPt building expansion. <br />It is not the same plan as was previously shown on their master plan. It is smaller in <br />magnitude and extends to the south rather than to the east Originally, it was shown as a <br />two-story building. The plan for this expansion is a single story. Access to the site is only <br />along the north side of the building. The smaller access from the east has been eliminaterl. <br />Efforts will be made to match the exterior with the existing building. The brick originally <br />used is no longer in stock, but the brick that has been chosen is a very close match. The <br />current asphalt will be sodded and trees planted. The plan does comply with all landscape <br />ordinance requirements. Additional entry doors will be constructed on the west side of the <br />building to provide additional access. They will be a dark brown brick to match the main <br />entrance. All of the roofing mechanical equipment will be screened to match what is on the <br />existing building. <br /> <br />This building expansion does cause the loss of four parking spaces on the north side of the <br />building but will still comply with ordinance requirements. The Planning Commission <br />recommended approval of the site plan as presented. <br /> <br />MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Aplikowski to approve the Site Plan Review for <br />Case No. 94-17, including construction material differences and the building <br />orientation difference for CPI. The motion was unanimously approved (4-0). <br /> <br />CASE NO. 94-19 - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - OPEN SALES LOTS <br /> <br />Fritsinger reported that there have been ongoing discussions over the last year about changes <br />to the merchants ordinances to clear up confusion between itinerant vendors on open sales <br />lots and how they are applied under existing ordinances. Staff is proposing a change in the <br />definition of retail sales by adding the following to the end of that definition: "and open <br />sales lots not included in the definition of retail sales." It has not been clear that open sales <br />lots are not allowed in Arden Hills. The Planning Commission unanimously approved this <br />amendment to the ordinance. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Council was to request staff to present the amendments of both the <br />ordinance and the Land Use Chart in the form of resolutions on the Consent Calendar for the <br />next Council meeting. <br />