CC 04-10-1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 4-10-89 , Page 8 CELLULAR ONE (Cont'd) Malone moved to amend the motion, seconded by Growe, to include the following conditions: 1. Amend Section 16(e): The Telephone Company agrees to pay a one-time fee of $1,000.00 toward expenses incurred by the City for the review of this lease, and $200.00 per occasions for each subsequent reviews. 2. Amend Section 4(b): The rent payable by the Tenant shall increase four percent (4%) per year during the entire length of the lease and its renewal. 3. Amend Section 6(e): The City shall allow access to the premises at all times, upon notification of the Landowner, the Public Works Supervisor or Ramsey County Sheriffs Department. Amendment to the motion carried. (5-0) Original motion as amended carried. (Mahowald, Growe, Malone and Sather voting in favor; Hansen opposed) (4-1) REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR CITY ATTORNEY; SELEC. PROCESS Council was referred to a report from Berger dated 4-10-89, relative to a proposed selection process for rating the City Attorney applicants. Council reviewed the proposed point rating system and concurred to change the number of points for legal resources to 2 and add 3 points if there is no conflict of interest; the firms receiving the highest number of points would be reviewed at the Council worksession scheduled for 4/17/89. CITY ENGINEER; RFP PROCESS Council was referred to a memorandum from Berger dated 4-5-89, which recommends a selection process for hiring the City's civil engineer. Council concurred with the recommendation to direct staff to select 15 local, civil engineering firms, utilizing the "Consulting Engineers Council of Minnesota" directory, and send them a Request for Proposals with a return deadline of May 1, 1989; the proposals would be reviewed and firms selected for interviews at a future meeting. Councilmember Hansen requested no RFP be sent to the Hickok Engineering firm; she stated high points should be given for Municipal experience in dealing with Elected Officials and determining City policies. REVISED CONSENT AGENDA FORMAT Council was referred to a memorandum from Administrative Secretary Mary Ann DeLaRosa dated 4-5-89, relative to a proposal for a revised Consent Agenda format. Councilmembers favored the revised format and preferred the Agenda to be printed on 8-1/2 x 11 inch colored paper. The Council commended DeLaRosa for the format. OTHER BUSINESS SIGNAL LIGHTS; LEXINGTON/GREY FOX & COUNTY ROAD F Councilmember Hansen questioned if the cost of the signal lights at Lexington Avenue and Grey Fox and County Road F would be shared with the City of Shoreview. Councilmember Malone recalled a cost sharing was previously discussed for the signal at Lexington & Grey Fox, however, a decision was not made to share the costs with Shoreview. Council directed the Clerk Administrator to contact the County Engineer to determine the cost sharing proposal on the signal light at County Road F and Lexington Avenue. EMPLOYEE STATUS; W. BRUNETTE Councilmember Hansen questioned the status of City employee Wayne Brunette; has he retired or requested disability leave. Berger advised he has been in contact with Brunette and the matter would be discussed at the worksession scheduled 4-17-89.