Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, August 29, 1988 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />REND'G PLANT (Cont'd) Hansen moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council <br />authorize the expenditure of $2,500 for Attorney Lynden <br />to draft an odor ordinance and utilize expertise of consultants he deems <br />necessary. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Council was of the consensus a Land Use Plan may not be necessary and in the <br />event it would be deemed necessary the Planning Consultant should be authorized <br />to utilize resources and expertise of other consultants as needed. <br /> <br />PLANNING STUDY; <br />I-694/I-35W <br /> <br />Council was referred to a memorandum from the Clerk <br />Administrator Berger dated 8-26-88 and Planner Bergly's <br />report dated 8-25-88 relative to the Land Study <br />N.E. intersection of I-694/I-35W. <br /> <br />recommendations at the <br /> <br />Dennis Probst, Chairman of the Planning Commission Task Force, was present and <br />reviewed the objectives and recommendations submitted to Council at their Regular <br />Meeting held 7-11-88. He requested Council consideration and action relative to <br />the recommendations outlined in the Clerk Administrator's memorandum, as follows: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-Council direct staff and the Planning Commission to initiate the Rezoning <br />of the Round Lake Site in order to insure the type of development that is <br />compatible to what has occured in the past and consistent with the community's <br />vision for the future. <br />-Council direct staff to evaluate various financial scenarios and outcomes <br />including market values of potential development; the City's potential risk <br />in public participation, TIF, Bonding for debt and other methods for financing <br />public improvements. <br />-Council participate in a worksession with staff, Planning Commission Task <br />Force, and a financial consultant in order to evaluate alternatives and determine <br />a course of action. <br /> <br />Clerk Administrator Berger referred Council to a report from James Casserly, <br />Financial Consultant, which illustrates the amount of major public improvements <br />that can be supported by each I million dollars of tax increment. The report also <br />showed how the City can minimize its risk factor in the development. Berger <br />suggested that Casserly be invited to attend a future Council meeting to discuss <br />the financial services he could provide in conjunction with the Round Lake <br />development. <br /> <br />Berger recommended the Village should proceed very carefully and conservatively; <br />initiation of the rezoning and the staff continuing to evaluate the financial <br />senarios would provide a good overview as to which direction to pursue. <br /> <br />There was discussion relative to the pros and cons of actively pursuing <br />development in this area, the feasibility of development at this location; the <br />legality of imposing a moritorium for a short time period, and establishing a <br />Community Development Committee. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Winiecki moved, seconded by Sather, that Council initiate <br />the Rezoning of the entire parcel of land outlined in the Land Use Study of the <br />N.E. quadrant of I-694/I-35W and begin establishment of an economic development <br />district. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn suggested if Planner Bergly had any further recommendations <br />relative to the Rezoning he should forward them to Council at a future date. <br /> <br />Winiecki moved, seconded by Peck, that Council establish <br />a Community Development Commission, including but not limited to members of the <br />staff, planning commission task force, Treasurer Green, and other persons who <br />could lend expertise to the commission, either by appointment or volunteer, and, <br />further, that Mr. Casserly be present to outline recommendations for the types of <br />financing available. Motion carried. (Winiecki, Peck, Hansen and Sather voting in <br />favor; Woodburn opposed) (4-1) <br /> <br />Council questioned if the Committee should be comprised at this time. <br /> <br />Winiecki clarified the intent of the motion was not to initiate the commission <br />work, only to inform persons who would be interested and involved of the <br />recommendations and alternatives. She commented it could be in a special <br />worksession with Council present. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />There was discussion relative to inviting Casserly and other financial <br />consultants to a future meeting. <br />