Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, June 13, 1988 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />CASE #88-14 & 88-15 <br />(Cont'd) <br /> <br />Winiecki moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve <br />the revised Site Plan for Case Nos. 88-14 and 88-15, <br />contingent upon: <br /> <br />1. Approval of the drainage plan by Rice Creek Watershed District and <br />ability to meet City dedication for proper drainage easement. <br />2. Applicant submission of Signage and Lighting Plan for City approval. <br />3. Applicant submission of revised Landscape Plan, as recommended and <br />approved by the City Planner. <br />4. Applicant inclusion of the crosswalk for safe pedestrian movement on <br />site as recommended by the City Engineer. <br />5. Applicant resolution of Park Dedication for the site. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />CASE #88-16 SUP; <br />HOME OCCUPATION <br />N. BEGGIN, 4519 <br />LAKESHORE PKWAY. <br /> <br />Council was referred to the Planner's memorandum of <br />6-1-88 relative to the application for a special use <br />permit to operate a beauty shop in the lower level of a <br />residence. <br /> <br />Bergly advised the applicant would be the only beauty operator and will use only <br />one chair/sink station. He noted the site meets all requirements and criteria <br />established in the zoning ordinance. <br /> <br />Council was referred to the Planning Commission minutes of 6-1-88 recommending <br />approval contingent upon applicant conformance with all zoning requirements. <br /> <br />Councilmember Winiecki questioned if the applicant was required by the State to <br />have a specific number of exits or if special wiring in the home would be <br />required. Winiecki also asked in the State permit would be for one operator only. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Nancy Beggin advised the State permit would be only for one operator, the State <br />does not require any specific number of exits and that no special wiring would be <br />necessary in her home. ' <br /> <br />Winiecki moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />Case No. 88-16, Special Use Permit for a home occupation to allow a one operator <br />beauty shop, with one chair/sink station, at 4519 Lakeshore Parkway, Nancy and <br />Glen Beggin, subject to applicant compliance with all zoning requirements for <br />home occupations. Motion csrried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />CASE #88-17 MINOR <br />SUBDIV & LOT CONSOL, <br />AREND & JESSUP <br /> <br />Council was referred to Planner's memorandum of 6-1-88 <br />relative to the application for a minor subdivision and <br />consolidation by Paul Arend and Dwight Jessup. <br /> <br />Bergly explained the applicants own the two lots abutting a vacant lot on <br />Dellwood Avenue. The applicants propose to divide Lot 13 in a manner that would <br />combine the upland areas surrounding the pond with the appropriate adjoining lot. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Planner stated that Lot 13 is primarily a large pond and was purchased <br />jointly by the applicants; they agree on the proposed division of the lot with <br />the high land area consolidated to Lot 12 and the area to south would be combined <br />with Lot 14. He explained the applicants had discussed the division line with the <br />Ramsey County Recorder's office and they indicated the proposed line is a COmmon <br />point that can be legally defined. <br /> <br />Bergly advised the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot split and <br />consolidation as it will alleviate the possibility of building on the property <br />and preserve the natural environment, which was the applicants' purpose for <br />requesting the split. <br /> <br />Winiecki moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />Case No. 88-17, Minor Subdivision and Consolidation to adjacent properties of the <br />vacant lot as outlined in the application of Paul and Jean Arend and Dwight and <br />Karon Jessup. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />CASE #88-09 PRELIM. <br />PLAT, VALENTINE HILLS <br />NO.2, D. DNISTRAN <br /> <br />Planner Bergly reviewed the previous discussions relative <br />to CASE #88-09, proposed plat for six lots to be located <br />at the intersection of County Road F and Valentine Ave. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Bergly advised the aerial map shows an area of wetland that is not active and <br />identifies a park on the north edge of the proposed plat. <br />