My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 01-25-1988
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
CC 01-25-1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:48 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, January 25, 1988, 7:00 p.m. - Village Hall <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Acting Mayor <br />Hansen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL The roll being called the following members were present: <br />Acting Mayor Nancy Hansen, Councilmembers Thomas Sather <br />and Jeanne Winiecki. Absent: Mayor Robert Woodburn and Councilmember Gary Peck. <br />Also present: Attorney James Lynden, Public Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz, <br />Clerk Administrator Patricia Morrison and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago. <br /> <br />CLOSED MEETING; <br />LABOR NEGOTIATIONS <br /> <br />Council discussed labor negotiations at a closed meeting <br />between 7:00 and 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />APPROVE MINUTES <br /> <br />Winiecki moved, seconded by Sather, that Council approve <br />the minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 11, <br />1988, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. (3-0) <br /> <br />, BUSINESS FROM FLOOR <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />KEM MILLING CO.: <br />1988 AGREEMENT <br /> <br />and Kem Milling Company <br /> <br />Council was referred to a letter from Attorney Lynden, <br />1-23-88, regarding several alternatives for consideration <br />by Council relative to the agreement between the Village <br />for operation of the rendering plant. <br /> <br />Jerry Liefert and Scott Parr, representatives from Minnesota Pollution Control <br />Agency, were present to discuss the Kem Milling Permit and the standards MPCA <br />would incorporate in the permit. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Liefert advised he would respond to inquiries sent by the Clerk Administrator, in <br />her letter dated 1-13-88; also that he would be writing the permit for the <br />rendering plant in Arden Hills, as well as the two rendering plants in New <br />Brighton. He stated that Scott Parr would be addressing the items which relate to <br />enforcement. Liefert noted that there were seven questions posed by the Council <br />and responded as follows: <br /> <br />I. What is the commitment level of your agency? Liefert stated that the MPCA is <br />committed to enforce it's regulations to the letter of the law if necessary to <br />ensure compliance with its Rules governing emission from the rendering plants. <br />That is, whatever it takes to bring Gordon Rendering (Mpls. Hide & Tallow) into <br />compliance will be required by the permit issued to Gordon Rendering. The same <br />committment applies to the two plants in New Brighton... <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. What Standards will be placed in the MPCA permit? Liefert advised the <br />Standards in the Air Quality permit issued to Gordon Rendering will include <br />source emission and ambient air limits delineated in Minn. Rules part 7005.0920; <br />odor testing in part 7005.0930; equipment breakdown in part 7005.0940, and, if <br />necessary, incineration of emissions delineated in part 7005.1030. Liefert <br />explained that incineration of emissions rule was the actual rule for rendering <br />plants, the first two rules are for odor emissions from any facility; he noted <br />that some persons have read the rule and assumed incineration was required, but <br />in fact the rules relate to a method equally effective. <br /> <br />In addition, requirements to make the facility air tight, on storing and <br />handling materials, and to abate fugitive emissions as delineated in part <br />7005.1040, which is a specific rule for rendering plants, will be included in the <br />permit to the extent necessary to ensure compliance. The permit will also contain <br />monitoring requirements on temperature and quantities of raw materials processed, <br />temperatures, pressures, and flow rates for scrubber parameters and/or <br />temperatures of incinerator combustion chamber. Gordon Rendering will be required <br />to retain all required recorded data for at least two years. <br /> <br />Liefert pointed out that although this evening he is specifically referring to <br />Gordon Rendering or Mpls. Hide & Tallow, the two plants in New Brighton will be <br />dealt with in the same manner. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. What will be the ramifications for non-compliance with MPCA standards? <br />Liefert explained that the ramifications of non-compliance are Notices of <br />Violation, Stipulation Agreements with penalities, Administrative Orders, <br />Litigation, and, as an extreme, revocation of the permit. Scott Parr stated those <br />are the different means of enforcement activities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.