Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> Minutes of the Regular Planning Commission Meeting, May 6, 1987 <br /> Page 3 <br />. REZONING (CONT'D) Planner advised that there is a 2-acre parcel between <br /> the Emerald Inn and Northwoods that has been reserved <br /> by the owner for retail development (on Red Fox Road). He noted that the owner <br /> proposes a restaurant for the site which would require a SUP. <br /> Acting Chair Petersen asked for comments from the floor in favor of or opposed <br /> to the requested rezoning. <br /> There was no response form the floor. <br /> The Public hearing was closed at 8:45 p.m. <br /> There was discussion relative to permitted uses in both 1-2 and B-2 districts, <br /> increased traffic on Lexington Avenue and the need for retail development. <br /> Sikora advised that the demand for space within Shannon Square has prompted the <br /> rezoning request. <br /> Planner Miller stated that although he has some concern about increasing the <br /> "strip commercial" appearance along Lexington Ave, the requested rezoning is <br /> generally acceptable for the following reasons: <br /> 1. The retail/service uses will not adversely affect the operation and <br /> safety of Lexington Ave. more than uses permitted under current zoning. <br /> 2. Use permitted by right in the B-2 district would not be incompatible <br />. with other development along Lexington Ave. <br /> 3. The site is proximate to established B-2 uses at Red Fox Rd. and <br /> Lexington. <br /> 4. The least desirable B-2 uses can be controlled through the SUP process. <br /> Moved by Babcook, seconded by Thorn, that Commisison <br /> recommend to Council approval of the Rezoning of the parcel at Lexington Avenue <br /> north of Grey Fox Road from 1-2 to B-2, Case No. 87-14, C.G. Rein Company, <br /> based on the fact that there appears to be a demand for retail/service oriented <br /> use of land in this area and the rezoning would not be incompatible or out of <br /> character with other development along Lexington Avenue. Motion carried <br /> unanimously. (5-0) <br /> CASE NO. 87-10; Planner Miller reviewed the request for a front setback <br /> FRONT SETBACK VAR. Variance for a house addition at 1305 Tiller Lane. He <br /> 1305 TILLER LANE noted that the houses along this block of Tiller Lane <br /> are at or near the 38.5 foot existing setback of this <br /> subject house. The applicant is requesting a 5.5 foot variance, therefore, the <br /> setback of the southeast corner of the house, as well as the new garage/family <br /> room wing would be 34.5 feet. <br /> Miller explained that variances have sometimes been approved based on the <br /> position of the existing house or for the constraints of its floor plan. <br /> However, considering the uniformity of this block, granting a variance might <br /> establish a new setback line by precident. <br />. <br />