CCP 03-09-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, March 9, 1987 Page 2 Council questioned if Roseville would proceed with the project in the event Arden Hills does not participate. Janisch advised Roseville would not begin the Glenhill Road improvement if Arden Hills does not participate. Mayor Woodbur~ asked the residents if they believed traffic has increased on Glenhill Road. Two residents stated traffic had increased; one stated it has not; one resident expressed concern for the excessive speed on the road. ~Q;- John Shelendich, 1459 Glenhill Rd, asked (provisions were made for access to property during the construction period. Janisch stated that notice would be given to residents if access to property would be prohibited during construction; he advised that every effort would be made to keep access to individual properties open. In discussion, Council advised residents that the assessments for the project ~ ' would be payable in 1988; also noted that Roseville has agreed to allow_,.~l!L- J, City to budget funds for this project for 1988 by deferring paymentrror one h,f, ~year. Also discussed was the possibility of streetlights in the area and if ~ speed signage should be considered, due to the increased traffic. . After determining there were nn additional questions or comments, either written or from the floor, the public hearing was closed at 8:03 p.m. In discussion, it was determined that the wording in the proposed Resolution, under Item #2, would have to be changed to designate Roseville's Engineer for the improvement rather than Arden Hill's Engineer. Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that Council approve Resolution No. 87-16, RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR P-86-28, GLENHILL ROAD, as per the proposed agreement and as amended under Item 112 by deleting "Village's Consulting Engineers, Short, Elliott, Henrickson" and adding: "Roseville Engineering Department". Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) AGREEMENT FOR Council reviewed the draft of an agreement with the City IMPROVEMENT OF of Roseville for this project; questioned the language GLENHILL ROAD in Item #7 pertaining to payment. h Dave Janisch explained that upon completion of the project an invoice will be sent to Arden Hills; after 60 days from receipt of that invoice, Roseville will begin to charge the interest.p~rceRt4ge. He noted that a specific date could not be given because the Glenhill project is being done in conjunction with other improvements in the City of Roseville. Council commended the Roseville staff for~ their cooperation on the . reconstruction project. Moved by Hansen, se~9nded by Sather, that Council enter into a Joint Powers Agreement for Recon~~sction of Glenhill Road, from Snelling Frontage Road to Hamline Avenue, pending review and approval of the draft agreement by Arden Hill's Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) CASE #87-02;A & B; Council was referred to Board of Appeals minutes SETBACK VARIANCES, (2/26/87), Planning Commission minutes (3/4/87) and 4173 & 4183 NORMA Planner's report (2-24-87). Planner Miller explained that setback variances were granted, when the addition I was platted, for a 20 ft. aggregate setback for several lots; the lots were 85 I ,'0_. ft. frontage and the unusual lot conditions warranted the approval of the request. He also noted that the properties for which the current variances are . requested resulted from incorrect positioning of the homes on the lot by the builder. Miller pointed out that granting the variances will simply "legalize" them, for the record, and eliminate encumbrances which might hinder the salability of the properties in the future; both Planning Commission and Board of Appeals recommended approval of the variances.