CCP 04-13-1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Minutes of Regular Planning Commission Meeting, April 1. 1987 Page 3 . SITE PLAN Another recommendation was that floodlights directed toward the (Cont'd) adjacent residences should be eliminated or relocated. He noted that the City should, as a condition of approval, retain the right to require re-orientation of light fixtures if light sources or glare are directly visible from adjacent roadways or properties. Larry Leitschuh, Manager of Scherer Lumber, reviewed the building plans and proposed renovation of the site for the Commission members. He advised that approval had been received from HNDOT to plant and maintain trees on the highway right-of-way, as per Permit No. 86S-200 (see letter of 2/5/87). Curtis asked if the plans presented addressed the concerns of the Planner. Leitschuh stated he had been in contact with the Planner and discussed the concerns; he advised that he is willing to work with the Planner regarding the relocation of lighting, landscaping and any other conditions the Commission members deem necessary. Meury asked the applicant to review the drainage plan. Leitschuh advised a drainage plan was included and he stated adequate drainage is provided on the site. He noted that he had received permission from and Rice Creek Watershed and Bonestroo Engineering had constructed the drainage system on the site. . Planner advised that he had discussed the drainage issue with the applicant; it appears that the applicant has gone through the proper channels. He stated that the Commission could recommend approval contingent upon the Engineer's review and approval of the drainage plan. Thorn asked what screening would be provided for the trailer park. Leitschuh reviewed the landscape plan and the screening provided for the mobile home park. There was discussion of the sign variance request; if the sign would be lighted or have a reader board attached. and what verbiage would be displayed. Leitshuh advised plans for the sign have not been finalized, however, it would be for identification purposes and would probably just display the company name. He noted that it may be lighted, but would not have a reader board. Thorn expressed concern regarding the size of the sign; stated the lumber yard is easily visible from the highway. Leitshuh noted that if Scherer is successful in their screening efforts visibility from the highway would be lessened. Thorn asked Planner if a "sunset provision" could be included so that the zoning would revert back should the lumber business cease or if a SUP would be . a better approach; if neither apply to the situation, what impact would the industrial zone have on the surrounding area.