My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 12-14-1987
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
CC 12-14-1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:08:07 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:51:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, December 14, 1987 <br />. 'i <br /> Page 5 <br /> RES. #87-69: Planner Miller introduced John Bergly, of Wehrman Bergly <br /> HONORING PLANNER Associates, Inc., who will serve as planning consultant <br /> to the Village due to Miller's resignation from the firm. <br /> t. Council welcomed John Bergly. <br /> Mayor Woodburn read Resolution No. 87-69, Honoring Orlyn Miller, City Planner, <br /> presented a Certificate of Appreciation, and thanked Orlyn for the fine job he <br /> has done over the years. <br /> Moved by Peck, seconded by Hansen, that Council adopt <br /> Resolution No. 87-69, Honoring Orlyn Miller, City Planner. Motion carried <br /> unanimou$~Y. (5-0) <br /> Miller expressed his sincere appreciation to the Council, Staff and residents of <br /> Arden Hills. <br /> CONTRACT AMENDMENT Moved by Sather, seconded by Peck, that Council authorize <br /> MPCA (SUPERFUND) the Mayor and Clerk Administrator to execute Amendment #1 <br /> to Contract No. 32300-10928. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> (5-0) <br /> DRAINAGE PROBLEM: Council was referred to a letter from the Attorney, <br /> 1680 OAK AVENUE 12-11-87, which reviewed the background of the drainage <br /> problems and correspondence to date. <br /> . Engineer Barry Peters explained the drainage pattern in the area; the original <br /> plan showed the drainage easement, however, that was changed and the result <br /> caused the damage to the driveway. Peters noted the following alternatives as a <br /> means of correcting the problem: <br /> 1. Do nothing and leave it to the homeowner to correct the problem. <br /> 2. Try to divert it to the original drainage easement that exists: costs <br /> would be excessive. <br /> 3. Utilize what current exists, put in a catch basin and underground pipe: <br /> recommended this would be efficient and less costly. <br /> Peters estimated the cost of alternative #3 at approximately $10.000.00; <br /> suggested the homeowner may be willing to share a portion of the reconstruction <br /> costs for the driveway, as there is currently work being done to reconstruct the <br /> driveway at this time. He explained that if a compromise agreement with the <br /> homeowner for the driveway replacement cannot be reached, an additional $3,000.00 <br /> should be included in the cost estimate. <br /> Lynden advised that a drainage easement would have to be obtained from the <br /> property owner underneath the easement, possibly Ramsey County, and the <br /> homeowner. <br /> . Council questioned if the homeowner to the north hed been contacted or made any <br /> comments relative to this situation; Lynden, Peters, and Morrison advised they <br /> had not heard from the property owner to the north. <br /> There was discussion regarding the placement of a concrete swale next to the <br /> driveway; Engineer advised there is currently one in place and it was his opinion <br /> that would not be the best solution to the problem. <br /> Council concurred to direct the City Attorney to contact the homeowner's legal <br /> counsel and discuss the possibility of the homeowner bearing a portion of the <br /> cost burden, check with Ramsey County to discuss the easement, and report back to <br /> Council at their next Regular Council meeting held on December 28, 1987. <br /> CHAR. GAMBLING ORD. Council discussed whether or not action was necessary <br /> for renewal of current Charitable Gambling licenses for <br /> 1988; Attorney Lynden advised that notice has not been received from the State <br /> Gambling Board for renewal of.the licenses. He noted that three of the licenses <br /> were granted in December of 1986 and the others do not expire until March or July <br /> of 1988. Lynden explained that Arden Hills has 30 days to disapprove the license <br /> after notification from the Gambling Board, with reasonable grounds for denial. <br />. Winiecki suggested that the ordinance include provision for requiring the <br /> charitable gambling organization make a contribution of up to 10 percent of the <br /> proceeds to a specific organization, not the City. She favored such a provision <br /> as it would benefit the citizens of Arden Hills. <br />'f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.