Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Regu. Council Heeting, September 14,.87 <br />Page .3 <br /> <br />RES. #87-59; ASSMT <br />DIS. TREE REMOVAL <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn opened the Public Hearing at 8:18 p.m. <br />and asked the Clerk Administrator to verify the <br />publication and mailing of the Notice of Hearing on the <br />special assessments for diseased tree removal. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Morrison advised that due notice was published in the New Briahton Bulletin on <br />August 26th and mailed on August 28, 1987. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn asked if there were any comments from the floor. <br /> <br />After determining there were no comments from the floor, Mayor Woodburn closed <br />the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. <br /> <br />Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />Resolution No. 87-59, ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DISEASED <br />TREE REMOVAL. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />RES. #87-60; ASSMT <br />ROSEVILLE WATER <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn opened the Public Hearing at 8:20 p.m. <br />and asked the Clerk Administrator to verify the <br />publication and mailing of the Notice of Hearing on the <br />special assessment for the Roseville Water Connection. <br /> <br />Morrison advised that due notice was published in the New Briahton Bulletin on <br />August 26th, and mailed on August 28, 1987. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn asked if there were any comments from the floor. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />After determining there were no comments from the floor, Mayor Woodburn closed <br />the public hearing at 8:21 p.m. <br /> <br />Peck moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve <br />Resolution No. 87-60, ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ROSEVILLE <br />WATER CONNECTION. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />CASE #87-28; SUP <br />ANTENNA, 1541 <br />EIlGEWATER, KAIlNKE <br /> <br />Council was referred to Planner's report, 8-26-87, and <br />Planning Commission Minutes, 9-2-87, relative to the <br />Special Use Permit application for a Radio Antenna at <br />1541 Edgewater Avenue, Joseph Kahnke. <br /> <br />Planner Miller explained the applicant is proposing to install an amateur radio <br />antenna in the rear yard of his home; 35 ft. in height, 2 inches in diameter, <br />does not require guy wires, and will be located approximately 35 ft. from his <br />home and from each side lot line. The tower will be approximately 60 ft. from <br />the rear lot line and, in case of windfall, it would clear the house and <br />adjacent properties. Miller discussed the aesthetics of the tower and noted <br />that the tower will be visible from adjacent properties and residents across <br />the street, however, because of the scale of this antenna, it would have no <br />greater impact than a regular TV antenna or a flagpole. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Miller advised that the Planning Commission had recommended approval and <br />reviewed the conditions stipulated. <br /> <br />Joseph Kahnke, 1541 Edgewater, was present to answer any questions. <br /> <br />Council questioned if there would be additional apparatus on the antenna. <br /> <br />Kahnke explained that he was not certain at this time; it would depend on <br />reception. He commented that if extensions were to be added at a later date, <br />they would be approximately 14 feet vertically, with rods measuring 1 inch in <br />diameter. <br /> <br />Winiecki asked if a 14 ft. span would be the largest the antenna would support. <br /> <br />Kahnke stated that was correct. <br /> <br />Council discussed whether or not the antenna would interfere with radio or <br />television reception in the area. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Winiecki commented it was clearly pointed out at the Planning Commission <br />meeting that the low level transmission does not interfere with either radio <br />or television reception. Planner Miller adVised he has had discussions with <br />experts who stated if appropriate equipment is used that should not be a <br />problem; he is not aware of any complaints given those currently operating in <br />the City. ' <br />