Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Regular~Cil Meeting. September 14, l~ <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />RES. 87-58 (Cont'd) Morrison advised that due notice was published in the <br />New Bri~hton Bulletin on August 26, and mailed to <br />affected property owners on August 28, 1987. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Larry Erickson, 1860 Indian Place, disputed his utility bill of $136.53 from <br />the second quarter billing; he advised that his normal bill is approximately <br />$60.00 and it was his opinion the higher amount was due to the replacement of <br />the inside water meter at his residence. Erickson explained that his meter may <br />have been defective for the past five years; he stated he was being indirectly <br />penalized because his meter had been replaced, and advised all residences <br />should be checked for such discrepancies. He noted his most recent bill was <br />$46.44. <br /> <br />Council questioned responsibility for repair of water meters inside residences. <br /> <br />Raddatz advised that City staff is usually called to repair inside meters, <br />however, it is the homeowners responsibility to see the meter is kept in good <br />working condition and report breakdowns. <br /> <br />Hansen advised that it is the opinion of the Public Safety/Works Committee <br />members that discrepancies should be paid by the homeowner, since the water was <br />used by them. She questioned if the inside or outside meter was more accurate. <br /> <br />Raddatz explained that the outside meter takes impulses from the inside meter <br />to change the number readings; temperature changes could affect the movement of <br />the numbers on the outside meters and it is the manufacturers opinion that the <br />inside meters are the more accurate of the two; he also noted that <br />. manufacturers have proven the meters are never in the City's favor. <br /> <br />Council questioned how many of the other delinquent utility bills from <br />residences were due to defective meters. <br /> <br />Raddatz advised that the only other defective meter bill being certified to the <br />County was for an industrial user. <br /> <br />Raddatz explained to Council that the bill may seem high. in a lump sum, <br />however, the meter may not have been working for the last five years and the <br />cost accumulated. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn commented that the meter readings to determine the extent of <br />this type of problem will commence with this quarterly period and an amnesty <br />provision is included on the cards for residents who determine there is a <br />problem. He questioned how long the City can go back to correct any error of <br />this type; it was his opinion that Erickson should not be charged for the <br />overage when other residents who will identify this problem will be granted <br />amnesty. <br /> <br />After determining there were no further comments from the floor, Mayor Woodburn <br />... closed the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council grant Larry <br />Erickson amnesty for the discrepancy remaining on his unpaid water bill as <br />provided on the water meter reading cards which will be distributed to <br />residences throughout the City, rationale for granting amnesty is that the <br />meter was defective, Erickson has brought the defective meter to our attention, <br />and, even though the Public Safety/Works Committee is of the opinion that <br />residents should be responsible for water used, a program for granting a grace <br />period to residents who identify such discrepancies has been initiated in the <br />City at this time. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />Winiecki clarified the fact that because Mr. Erickson identified the defective <br />meter is the reason for the vote of amnesty; trying to make it clear that a <br />precedent is not being set in case other cases arise in the future. <br /> <br />Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />Resolution No. 87-58. ADOPTING 'AND CONFIRMING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR <br />DELI~QUENT SEWER AND WATER ACCOUNTS, and, furthermore, that Larry Erickson's <br />name be deleted from the assessment roll. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />. Councilmember Peck questioned the City's authority to shut off water <br />delinquent accounts become extremely excessive. Council concurred to <br />this matter under Other Business on the Agenda. <br /> <br />before the <br />discuss <br />