Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - DECEMBER 18, 2023 10 <br />Mayor Grant stated that Councilmember Holden still has no committees but would like to serve <br />on the Communications Committee. He had heard other's preferences, but thought it didn't speak <br />well of the Council to not allow Councilmember Holden to serve. <br />D. Preliminary Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Commercial Zoning Discussion <br />City Administrator Perrault explained this would be the first of a two-part discussion regarding <br />a number of zoning changes at Rice Creek Commons. At a previous City Council meeting they <br />discussed changes to the areas west of the spine road. This was in -light of the recent developer <br />proposal to increase the density from 1,460 to up to 1,960 housing units. Council may want to <br />consider modifications to the commercial zoning regardless of any density changes or as a result <br />of anticipated zoning changes. If they allow warehousing at least 30% of the building must be <br />office. For big box retailer in Retail Mixed -Use there is no provision barring big box. Should <br />Council want to suggest changes, it should also provide direction on how to move those forward. <br />He noted there are other parties that are a part of this discussion, such as the County Board, the <br />developer, and the JDA. <br />Mayor Grant said he wanted to see jobs in that area, not necessarily 70% warehouse. They could <br />go into discussions about the 30% being a percent of total square footage or of the footprint, or <br />what constitutes office. That structure could be changed. He thought as they shrink commercial <br />they need to be careful in terms of the area's appearance and building materials, especially <br />because 20% of the proposal is affordable housing. What should the exterior building materials <br />be? Tip up concrete has gotten better, but they need to be sure it looks like good quality and will <br />stand the test of time. <br />Councilmember Holden asked who the County was negotiating with for Outlot A. <br />City Administrator Perrault couldn't say as it has not been publicly disclosed yet. They are <br />having a closed session in early January to discuss the purchase agreement. He didn't think the <br />entire JDA knew, but he thought the County Board representatives did. <br />Councilmember Holden commented that they are not partners with the County on Outlot A, <br />then. <br />City Administrator Perrault responded that we are not privy to the land sale. <br />Councilmember Holden said they took the bid, they're the ones that are negotiating it and the <br />City has no clue who they are, so they're not really partners. When the JDA had the commercial <br />marketing experts in, what did they say about commercial? <br />City Administrator Perrault thought the main takeaway was to continue to offer flexibility to <br />allow for more types of businesses to enter the space. They had a retail person come in and <br />someone from Greater MSP and two others that were more housing related. There is less demand <br />for office space but more demand for light manufacturing, R&D, etc. The message was the more <br />flexibility we can have in the zoning codes to attract businesses coming in will serve the <br />community better. <br />