My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-18-23-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
12-18-23-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 11:15:41 AM
Creation date
2/13/2024 11:15:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - DECEMBER 18, 2023 3 <br />Mr. Nesler stated mobilization is the cost for the contractor to get to the site; get equipment there, <br />get set up, insurance etc. <br />Councilmember Fabel asked if the cost of the project would be paid from the water utility fees. <br />City Administrator Perrault replied yes, it would. <br />Councilmember Rousseau wondered if they go for the UASI grant would it be possible they can <br />try for everything but if they don't get the grant or only get a portion of the money they could <br />remove some of the more optional items? <br />Mr. Nesler responded yes, they could set it up with a base bid and alternate add ons. <br />Mayor Grant asked about the timing of the grant. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller stated grant applications are accepted in late <br />January/early February. <br />Mr. Nesler added that the UASI grant is the only one coming up that would allow them to bid the <br />project and get it ready for construction in 2024. The other funding options application dates <br />have passed and if they waited to apply for them it would push the project out another year. <br />Mayor Grant asked if that would be for the security or the security and repairs. <br />Mr. Nesler said it would be for security, he thought everything could be applied for with the <br />Small Cities grant, and the Drinking Water Revolving Loan Fund would be a low interest loan. <br />There would be no guarantee of receiving either of those. <br />Councilmember Holden felt they were adding a fence that really wasn't securing the water <br />tower. <br />Mr. Nesler said it would be more secure than it is today. <br />Councilmember Holden said the water fund is good but they've been pushing hard for the last <br />five years asking for State bonding for water projects so they could pay for water meters and there <br />wasn't a significant increase in people's water bills when the million dollars came due. It's nice <br />the water fund is good but there's a reason why they've been keeping it healthy. She asked when <br />they would secure the second water tower — could they apply for a grant for both of them? Did <br />they have to be doing construction on the other tower in order to put security on it? Could they <br />ask for additional money to do the other water tower? <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller didn't know the timing on the other tower, he'd have to <br />ask the Public Works Director. He thought adding the security was being done at a favorable time <br />because they would already be working on the tower. <br />Mr. Nesler added that he'd have to look at details on the security grant. Typically, the grants <br />would require the money be spent within a certain amount of time, and some grants require plans <br />to be submitted with the application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.