My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-18-23-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
12-18-23-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 11:15:41 AM
Creation date
2/13/2024 11:15:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - DECEMBER 18, 2023 4 <br />Councilmember Holden said she's always been interested in the security of the water towers <br />because it just takes one person — and they aren't redundant in 100% of the city so they really <br />need some security. <br />Councilmember Monson said the memo talks about needing an additional $200,000, was that on <br />top of the meter needs? <br />City Administrator Perrault believed the water meters were programmed into what they were <br />seeing, so this would be on top of the water meters. <br />Councilmember Holden said that the Public Works Director met with water meter people and <br />found out there was going to be a significant increase in parts costs. She didn't know if that was <br />projected on the chart. <br />City Administrator Perrault thought it should have been programmed into the CIP, so the water <br />meter costs should be incorporated into what they are seeing in their packet. <br />City Administrator Perrault asked if they pursued the grant was there any reason they couldn't <br />include a fence for the other water tower at the same time, understanding the design hasn't been <br />done. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller thought they would have to do an inspection of the site <br />to see if it was reasonable. <br />Mr. Nesler added that on the face it would be doable but they would need to look into it more. <br />Councilmember Monson liked the idea of at least assessing the other fence. She asked for an <br />explanation of why they wanted a card reader versus a manual gate. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller replied it was because being able to plow through the <br />primary gate was an important function when they were doing snow operations; to be able to <br />badge in at the bottom of the hill and get momentum to go into the actual site to plow the snow. <br />The other two are for badging in like they would anywhere, like at Public Works and they are <br />more secondary because you're out of your vehicle already. <br />Councilmember Monson asked if why couldn't manually lift the gate and then get back into the <br />snow plow. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Miller stated the card reader was at the right of way and the <br />gate is at the top of the hill. <br />Mr. Nesler added another reason was that cell phone operators have access to the code so by <br />adding a badge reader they can program in that for example, AT&T has access from 8:00-5:00 on <br />a particular day, so Public Works employees don't have to meet them there. <br />Councilmember Rousseau asked if they add the second water tower will that impact the timing, <br />or put us at risk of not being able to get that grant request in in January. <br />Mr. Nesler felt they could make a pretty quick assessment to say if it would be a lot of work or <br />not, and decide if they have time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.