Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Regular ~Cil Meeting, August 10. 1987 ~ <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />CASE #87-23; (Cont'd) Moved by Winiecki. seconded by Hansen. that Council <br />deny Case 87-23. Rezoning from R-1 to R-4 and PUD <br />Concept Plan for a 48-unit Apartment Building, 12 units per acre, on Snelling <br />Avenue and Highway 96. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />CASE #87-24; SUP <br />EXPAN.. BLUE FOX <br />INN. LEXINGTON <br /> <br />Council was referred to Planner's report (7-20-87) and <br />Planning Commission minutes of 8-5-87; relative to the <br />amended Special Use P~rmit for expansion of the Blue <br />Fox Inn at 3833 North Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Planner explained the applicant is proposing to construct two small additions <br />to the existing restaurant/lounge; both additions will be glass solariums with <br />metal support beams. He indicated that the applicant has met all ordinance <br />requirements relative to setbacks and building coverage. site coverage and <br />parking. Miller advised that he and the Planning Commission recommended <br />approval be conditioned upon the installation of no parking signage at the east <br />end of the building and replacement of plant materials in the reconstructed <br />planters. <br /> <br />Tom Cossack, owner of the property, was present to answer Council questions. <br /> <br />Counci1member Winiecki questioned if there would be planters around the <br />solarium that faces the parking area; also if a landscape plan was submitted. <br /> <br />Cossack advised that each solarium would have a planter across the width and <br />greens would be planted. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The Planner stated that no landscape plan was provided by the applicant; <br />only verbal acknowled~nt that original plantings would be replaced. <br /> <br />Moved by Hansen. seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />Case #87-24, Amended Special Use Permit for expansion of Blue Fox Inn, 3833 <br />North Lexington Avenue. contingent upon applicant installing no parking signage <br />at the east end of the building and replacing plant materials in the <br />reconstructed planters. <br /> <br />Moved by Winiecki, seconded by Hansen, that the motion <br />be amended to include as a condition that a landscape plan be submitted for <br />Planner's review and approval. Amendment to motion carried. (4-0) <br /> <br />Original motion as amended carried unanimously. (4-0) <br /> <br />CASE #87-26; PUD & <br />GENR'L PLAN APPRVL <br />EDGEWATER EST./HWY <br />10 & PARKSHORE DR. <br /> <br />Council was referred to Planner's report of 7-23-87 and <br />Planning Commission minutes of 8-5-87, relative to the <br />PUD and General plan approval for the townhouse portion <br />of the Edgewater Estates project. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Planner gave a brief background of the 1985 PUD concept plan approval for this <br />project; he noted that original approval was for 31 townhouse units. The <br />applicant is now requesting approval of the PUD General Plan for 29 townhouse <br />units and Rezoning of the site to the R-3 District. <br /> <br />Miller noted that since his report was submitted the applicant has submitted <br />the lighting plan. landscape plan and grading plan. The grading plan was sent <br />to the Engineer for review and approval; however. no response has been received <br />to date. Miller advised that the landscape and lighting plan were adequate and <br />he displayed for Council review a copy of the proposed lighting on the site. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn questioned if the proposed lighting would be placed on the <br />right-of-way and who would be responsible for maintenance. <br /> <br />The Planner stated that the lights would be placed behind the right-of-way; <br />placement on the plan was for visual notation. only. and all costs for <br />installation and maintenance would be paid by the owner/developer. <br /> <br />Kim and Keith Tramm, Mar-Don Homes, Inc., were present to answer Council <br />questions. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planner noted the changes that have been made to respond to the recommendations <br />in his report; length of buildings. parking nodes provided for visitor parking, <br />submission of preliminary plat (ownership of parcel under unit and common <br />space), and berming has been addressed in the new grading plan. <br />