My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-24-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
01-08-24-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2024 2:59:10 PM
Creation date
2/13/2024 2:58:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL —JANUARY 8, 2024 16 <br /> Mayor Grant noted Bob Lux from Alatus was selected for this project and he believed Mr. Lux <br /> had innovative and creative ideas. He was of the opinion it was a mistake to remove the <br /> businesses in the southwest corner. He commented on how the project needed to be a vibrant mix <br /> of retail, housing, shopping and restaurants. He indicated the development does not get made <br /> special by adding more housing. He stated again that his biggest concern was with the financials, <br /> but this was not being addressed because this was a rezoning. He explained he wanted the project <br /> to move forward, but he questioned if this should be done without proper vetting. <br /> Mayor Grant reported he does not have an answer on if an agreement was in place on the Civic <br /> Center or if the proper utilities were in place. He stated if the rezonings were approved at this <br /> meeting, the decisions down the road get increasingly difficult. He indicated remediation work <br /> has to be redone on the wells and none of this information was available at this time. He wished <br /> that the entire Council could be included in the planning process for this project. <br /> Councilmember Monson explained a lot of the comments that have been made would be <br /> addressed in the development agreement and were not part of the zoning code. She reported she <br /> would never put the City in financial harm for a development. She indicated she would make sure <br /> the financial statements were sound. She encouraged the residents to watch and listen to the JDA <br /> meetings, along with the worksession meeting where the economics of this project were <br /> discussed. She reported there was opportunity for residents to comment on TCAAP at all City <br /> Council and worksession meetings. In addition, she encouraged residents to contact her if there <br /> was any information they would like to know about the TCAAP project. <br /> Councilmember Monson called the question. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Fabel seconded a <br /> motion to call the question. The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmember Holden <br /> and Mayor Grant opposed). <br /> The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant opposed). <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Fabel moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a <br /> motion to adopt Resolution 2024-006 for Planning Case 23-021 for <br /> Comprehensive Plan Amendments to Chapter 6 and Appendix G to allow for <br /> an increase in residential density up to 1,960 units within the regulating plan <br /> for TCAAP based on the Findings of Fact and as presented in the January 8, <br /> 2024 report to the City Council. <br /> Community Development Director Jagoe asked if the Council's motion included the amended <br /> language for the 60% AMI language. <br /> Mayor Grant reported the question has been called and the language could no longer be <br /> amended. <br /> Councilmember Monson requested clarification from h q the City Attorney on this matter. <br /> City Attorney Schmidt stated it was her understanding that when Councilmember Fabel made <br /> the motion he included it at that point, but when he reread the motion, it was not. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.