Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Regulareuncil Meeting, May 26, 1987 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />CHAR. GAMBLING Clerk Administrator Morrison advised Council she had <br />DRAFT ORDINANCE discussed preliminarily the matter of drafting the <br />Charitable Gambling Ordinance with Attorney Lynden. She <br />advised that they would like to have an opportunity to review ordinances <br />adopted by other cities; including Little Canada, prior to final drafting of an . <br />ordinance for Arden Hills. Morrison also stated that Lynden would prefer to <br />have more time to study the "phase out" process, to assure it's legality. <br /> <br />Council recommended not reviewing the Little Canada Ordinance because of it's <br />length and complexity; consensus was to continue this matter until the Attorney <br />. has prepared the draft ordinance. <br /> <br />SEWER UTILITY <br />RATE INCREASE <br /> <br />Larry Erickson and Charlotte McNiesh, members of the <br />Finance Committee, were present to answer Council <br />questions and discuss tqe utility rate increase <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />In reference to the comment regarding "a minimal amount of cushion" provided in <br />the increase, Erickson advised it is his opinion there is no cushion worked <br />into the rate increase. He explained the Committee took the average, cost <br />increases from the Metro Waste Control Commission and Arden Hills overhead <br />costs since the year 1985. After computation of the overhead costs and the <br />increase percentages the Committee projected the recommended increase may be <br />sufficient throughout 1989. <br /> <br />. <br />Council questioned if there would be different sewer rates for different types . <br />of accounts; commercial, residential, non-profit. <br /> <br />Clerk Administrator stated the Village Attorney advised it is unconstitutional <br />to charge more to non-profit accounts, therefore, they are charged the same <br />basic rates. <br /> <br />Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />the Sewer Utility Rate increase, as recommended by the Finance Committee and <br />listed as follows: <br /> <br />Commercial - $1.68 ($1.46/thousand gal. flowage, plus $.22) <br />Residential - $31.2) ($27.l6/quarter, plus 15% increase) <br />Seniors - $15.62 (1/2 of $31.23) <br /> <br />Council further determined this increase is for usage commencing July 1, 1987, <br />for billing in September of 1987. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />A confirming and final resolution will be drafted for Council approval. <br /> <br />WATER UTILITY <br />RATE INCREASE <br /> <br />1,000 gallons, <br /> <br />Sather moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve <br />the Water Utility rate increase, as recommended by the <br />Finance Committee, that the rates be increased $.17 per <br />effective July 1, 1987. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A confirming and final resolution will be drafted for Council approval. <br /> <br />WATER METER <br />DISCREPANCIES <br /> <br />Council asked the Public Works Supervisor if there is <br />a Village policy established which provides for charges <br />to residents when the outside water meter does not <br />reconcile with the inside water meter reading. <br /> <br />Raddatz noted that no policy has been established to date; the discrepancy <br />between outside and inside water meters was first discovered in the Townhouse <br />Village; he noted the inside meter measures the actual amount used by the <br />homeowner. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn commented that it is his opinion he would have difficulty <br />assessing charges back to the homeowner for a malfunction in the City's <br />equipment; he asked for Council'comments regarding a policy for assessment of <br />the fee; such as the Village splitting the cost with the homeowner. <br /> <br />Councilmember Winiecki asked at what the top dollar figure would be for the <br />Village to split the cost with the homeowner. <br /> <br />Raddatz advised it is his opinion that the discrepancy should be paid by the <br />homeowner; rationale is that the outside meter is used for the City's <br />convenience, however, the inside meter measures the amount of water used and is <br />the determining factor in billing for usage. <br /> <br />. <br />