CC 12-12-1966 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

REPORT 'OF ENGINEER DONALD LUND Lambros Drainaqe Matter There was much discussion on the distribution of cosY for a solution to the Lambros drainage problemo Engineer Lund suggested that Arden Hill s, Shorevlew, Rosevl I Ie, and Ramsey County share I n the cost an'd presented tentative amounts for eacho He expleined that these figures were based on Plan fJ2, w h I c h ca II s for the replacement of 100 ft. of 36" pipe with 72" pipe. Mr. Lambros stated that Plan 62 would accomplish nothing for the future problems and was In disagreement with the above table; he '~e I t the State Highway Department should be contacted for its proportionate share, and the Ramsey County figure was much too lowo He and Trustee Crepeau had attended the Ramsey County Board meeting and according to Ramsey .ounty, Plan Noo 3 appeared to be the only satisfactory solutlon(Plan tl3 ails for 175 fto of pipe, with an estimated ~Dsf of $8,499). Engineer Lund was requesteu l~ submit revised figures at the next meeting. Mayor Nethercut explained that Plan No. i <'In fi"o of pipe) \10U I d bsnef I)' the Lambros property only; there'~ore, plans numbered 2 and 3 were the only ones consideredo Plan '2 would enlarge the culvert, wh I ch wou I d ~'ake care 0'( the Vi Ilage's responsibility - Plan #3 calls "cor 175 fto of pipe would partially benefit the Lambros propertyo Mayor Nethercut further stated that the Village cannot legally spend Village funds for the Im- provement o'~ private propertyo If Plan 63 is considered Mr. Lambros \10U I d be Ii ab I e for the difference in cost between Plans 2 and 30 Trustee Hoffmann moved to authorize the Village engineer prepare the plans and specificatIons for advertIsing for bids for Plan 1112 and an alternate including the add!tional pipe as in Plan 30 ~1r . Lambros would pay his share of the alternate plan which would benefit his prop- erty; seconded by Trustee BJorndahl; motion carrledo Sewer Improvement No. 4 Extension Engineer Lund informed the Council that lots 6 and 7, Block 2, Shorewood Hi lis, were not provided for sewer service under Sewer Improve- ment #4; they have been assessed for their portion of tha Roseville co~nectlon which would leave a balance o'f $6090 par fonrt foot plus the $50000 stub charge to be assessed. He estimated the cost of I nsta II i ng theservice at a cost of $2,272000, but this cost could be lowered to under $2,000000 by having Vii lage personnel do the sodding in the springo This would eliminate the delay which would be caused by the necessity of ad- ver-i-islng 'for bldso Trustee Olmen moved that Banister Engineering Company be authorized to prepare plans and specifications for thIs service connection and to ob- tain bids as per plans; seconded by Trustee Bjorndahl; motion carrledo Req ues-( for Access Road - Hiqhw8Y 96 and 35W Engineer Lund informed the Council of a request to the State for an access road on the southeast cornsr of Highway 96 and 35\~ ; he felt this ~JOU I d not be objectlonab:e to the Vlllageo The Council authorized Engineer Lund to so Inform the State. Nel!! Brl~hton - Rosevll Ie - Arden Hi I Is Dralnaqe Engineer Lund informed the Council of e petitIon from New Brighton and ~osevi'le requesting Ramsey County to take care of the County drainage ditch roblem in which Arden HI! Is might eventually become involvedo Roger Short, Banister Engineer Company,'woulc be present at this meeting, which has been set for December 19th, our l nteres'"j' In the matter would be recog- nizedo Ramsey County Beach Se~ler Rate Tr~stea Crepeau moved, seconded by Trustee Bjorndahi, that -~he annua! Arden Hil Is sewer chBrge for the Ramsey County Beach be establ ished $21.00 ( $12.00 for the 3/4" me';'er sizo and $9000 supplemental charge, based on one-fourth of the $36000 Recreational Center charge since the beach is only used three months of '(he year; motion carried. --. --- . '<--- -3- --- _.-- ---