Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> The architectual design of existing buildings present certain limitations for . <br /> expansion. The equipment access doors of the Public Works Building open <br /> toward the east. Expansion in that direction would require substantial re- <br /> construction of the existing structure. Since the existing facility already con- <br /> sists of two separate structures, it is doubtful that such alteration is feasible. <br /> The problems of expansion to the south, although structurally more feasible, is <br /> undesirable because of limited space and the use relationship problems dis- <br /> cussed in the preceding paragraph. <br /> Two alternative exist. One is expansion to the west. Although it appears <br /> to be feasible architecturolly, this approach would require substantial alter- <br /> ation of the on-site circulation system and may create access problems. The <br /> other alternative is expansion to the north of the existing building. This cou Id <br /> be accommodated without major changes to existing access and circulation. <br /> However, since expansion in this area projects toward Highway 96, its visual <br /> impact may be greater. <br /> A third alternative may exist: Construction of a separate building. This <br /> approach, however, would likely create certain additional inefficen- <br /> cies, would present a more "crowded" appearance, and would probably re- <br /> sult in greater site coverage due to additional access and circulation drives. <br /> It is not considered a viable alternative. <br /> The Vi lIage Hall is a long, narrow structure with a gabled roof. Expansion to . <br /> the west is limited by the buildings relationship to the property line. Expan- <br /> sion to the east has no physical limitations, but at some point the length of <br /> the building may create functional inefficiencies. Although abundant open <br /> space exists for expansion to the south of the existing bui Iding, its design <br /> (i.e. gabled roof, window locations, floor plan) may represent romerous <br /> architectural limitations. <br /> LOGICAL DIRECTIONS OF EXPANSION <br /> Exhibit 2 represents logical directions in which building expansion could occur. <br /> The directions defined are bQ6ed upon space ovailability, apparent functional <br /> relationships and, to a limited degree, architectual considerations. Although <br /> not necessarily exclusive, these appear to be the most logical directions for <br /> future construction. <br /> . <br /> -5- <br />.;,;.".---::-~- ---:.~----~~-'-' - .- '.'~-~ -- - '.-' .- -. -. --.--.- -- .- ~ -- - .. --- - -.- ---.-,-- ......-----_._~_._- -~-- -~'_.-- <br />